Weekly News via Email
   Set as homepage | Add to favorites | Customer Service | Subscribe Now | Place an Ad | Contact Us | Sitemap Sunday, 04.20.2014
Classifieds
News Archive
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
 1  2
 3  4  5  6  7  8  9
 10  11  12  13  14  15  16
 17  18  19  20  21  22  23
 24  25  26  27  28  29  30
Online Extras
Site Services
Around Bend
Outdoor Fun
Travel Info
Shop Local




Members Of



Poll: Today's Live Poll
Email to a friend | Print this | PDF version | Comments (0 posted) 
  Blogger |   del.icio.us |   digg |   newsvine

Jun 15,2007
The Elderlaw Forum: Social Security avoids ‘unilateral mistake’ rule
by Professor Michael Myers

In contract law a “mistake” is an erroneous belief, at the time of contracting, that certain facts are true. 

A “unilateral mistake” is where only one party to a contract is mistaken.  The courts will uphold such a contract unless the non-mistaken party was aware of the mistake and tried to take advantage of it. This rule of law seeks to avoid harm to an innocent party acting in good faith.

It applies to all contracting parties, with a notable exception: The federal government, and in a case presented by a senior helpline caller - the Social Security Administration.  Here is what happened:

The caller’s husband died in 1994 from an unexpected heart attack at age 49.  She was widowed with two children, ages 11 and 14.  They received survivor benefits; the children’s benefits terminating at age 18.  Her benefits terminated in 2001.

During the course of such payments, from 1994 to 2001, Social Security sent several notices of “underpayment” and “overpayment” as it adjusted for its own “unilateral” mistakes in payment calculation.  The caller assumed that a computerized government agency was capable of making accurate benefit payments.

She was wrong.  Last month she received a notice from Social Security alleging that it “overpaid” her in 1998 by some $2,200 and demanded repayment within 30 days.

In a letter I wrote on her behalf, I stated: “She justifiably assumed the “adjustments” were properly made, taking SSA at its word.  She had absolutely no reason to believe the federal government was not capable of making appropriate payments.  And now, nine years later she receives this claim. This is a rather remarkable gesture.” 

It may be remarkable, but the law is on Social Security’s side.  It is not bound by a statute of limitations. Also, it is not bound by the law of “unilateral mistake.”  I filed a “Request for Reconsideration,” contesting the calculation, objecting to the nine-year delay, and asking for a waiver on the grounds that repayment would impose an unreasonable financial burden upon an elder of modest means approaching retirement.

The law of unilateral mistake and statutes of limitation are intended to provide balance to the scales of justice.  Social Security has its thumb on the scales.

(Pro bono legal information and advice is available to persons 55 and older through the USD Senior Legal Helpline, 1-800-747-1895; mmyers@usd.edu; opinions are solely those of the author and not the University of South Dakota

2039 times read

Related news
The Elderlaw Forum: Hospital renegs on oral agreement by Professor_Michael_Myers posted on Aug 17,2007

The Elderlaw Forum: Arizona man trying to escape ‘cell hell’ by Professor_Michael_Myers posted on Mar 16,2007


The Elderlaw Forum: Social Security direct deposit places seniors at risk by Professor_Michael_Myers posted on May 11,2007

The Elderlaw Forum: Physician ignores ruptured appendix complaint by Professor_Michael_Myers posted on Aug 31,2007

Did you enjoy this article? Rating: 4.90Rating: 4.90Rating: 4.90Rating: 4.90Rating: 4.90 (total 41 votes)

Market Information
Breaking News
Most Popular
Most Commented
Featured Columnist
Horoscope Guide
Aquarius Aquarius Libra Libra
Aries Aries Pisces Pisces
Cancer Cancer Sagittarius Sagittarius
Capricorn Capricorn Scorpio Scorpio
Gemini Gemini Taurus Taurus
Leo Leo Virgo Virgo
Local Attractions
Bend Visitors & Convention Bureau
Bend Visitors & Convention Bureau

Mt. Bachelor Resort
Mt. Bachelor Resort

Les Schwab Ampitheater
Les Schwab Ampitheater

Deschutes County Fairgrounds
Deschutes County
Fairgrounds

Tower Theatre
Tower Theatre

The High Desert Museum

Advertisements



Deschutes County

Google  
  Web    BendWeekly.com
© 2006 Bend Weekly News
A .Com Endeavors, Inc. Company.
All Rights Reserved. Terms under
which this service is provided to you.
Please read our Privacy Policy. Contact us.
Bend Weekly News & Event Guide Online
   Save the Net
Advertisement
External sites open in new window,
not endorsed by BendWeekly.com
Subscribe in NewsGator Online
Add to Google Add to MSN Add to My AOL
What are RSS headlines?