Weekly News via Email
   Set as homepage | Add to favorites | Customer Service | Subscribe Now | Place an Ad | Contact Us | Sitemap Thursday, 09.18.2014
Classifieds
News Archive
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
 1  2  3  4  5
 6  7  8  9  10  11  12
 13  14  15  16  17  18  19
 20  21  22  23  24  25  26
 27  28  29  30  31
Online Extras
Site Services
Around Bend
Outdoor Fun
Travel Info
Shop Local




Members Of



Poll: Today's Live Poll
Email to a friend | Print this | PDF version | Comments (0 posted) 
  Blogger |   del.icio.us |   digg |   newsvine

Jan 16,2008
High court: N.Y. conventions pass muster
by UPI

WASHINGTON - The U.S. Supreme Court ruled Wednesday New York political parties may continue to use conventions to select local nominees, including judges.

Since 1921, New York election law has required the parties to select nominees by conventions composed of delegates elected by party members. To run for delegate, an individual must submit a petition with 500 signatures, and the convention nominees appear automatically on the ballot.

The nominees include prospective State Supreme Court justices, a judgeship filled by election in each of the state's judicial districts under the state Constitution.

A group of failed judicial candidates, one of whom said she was not supported because she refused to comply with patronage requests, filed suit seeking a declaration that the convention system violated the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution -- keeping the failed candidates off the ballot -- and an injunction ordering a primary election to select State Supreme Court nominees.

The lower courts agreed with the failed candidates, but the U.S. Supreme Court disagreed.

In the opinion of the high court joined or concurred in by all the other justices, Justice Antonin Scalia reversed.

"New York state has thrice (in 1846, 1911, and 1921) displayed a willingness to reconsider its method of selecting Supreme Court Justices," Scalia wrote. "If it wishes to return to the primary system that it discarded in 1921, it is free to do so; but the First Amendment does not compel that."

© 2008 United Press International. All Rights Reserved.

594 times read

Related news
A horrible ruling by the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel posted on Jun 29,2007

Senior lawyer to challenge Musharraf by UPI posted on Dec 13,2007

U.S. Supreme Court ignores gun cases by UPI posted on Nov 13,2007

Supreme Court limits use of union dues by UPI posted on Jun 15,2007

Calif. justices to consider gay marriage by UPI posted on Mar 04,2008

Did you enjoy this article? Rating: 4.96Rating: 4.96Rating: 4.96Rating: 4.96Rating: 4.96 (total 57 votes)

Market Information
Breaking News
Most Popular
Most Commented
Featured Columnist
Horoscope Guide
Aquarius Aquarius Libra Libra
Aries Aries Pisces Pisces
Cancer Cancer Sagittarius Sagittarius
Capricorn Capricorn Scorpio Scorpio
Gemini Gemini Taurus Taurus
Leo Leo Virgo Virgo
Local Attractions
Bend Visitors & Convention Bureau
Bend Visitors & Convention Bureau

Mt. Bachelor Resort
Mt. Bachelor Resort

Les Schwab Ampitheater
Les Schwab Ampitheater

Deschutes County Fairgrounds
Deschutes County
Fairgrounds

Tower Theatre
Tower Theatre

The High Desert Museum

Advertisements



Deschutes County

Google  
  Web    BendWeekly.com
© 2006 Bend Weekly News
A .Com Endeavors, Inc. Company.
All Rights Reserved. Terms under
which this service is provided to you.
Please read our Privacy Policy. Contact us.
Bend Weekly News & Event Guide Online
   Save the Net
Advertisement
External sites open in new window,
not endorsed by BendWeekly.com
Subscribe in NewsGator Online
Add to Google Add to MSN Add to My AOL
What are RSS headlines?