Weekly News via Email
   Set as homepage | Add to favorites | Customer Service | Subscribe Now | Place an Ad | Contact Us | Sitemap Wednesday, 02.21.2018
News Archive
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
 1  2  3  4  5  6
 7  8  9  10  11  12  13
 14  15  16  17  18  19  20
 21  22  23  24  25  26  27
 28  29  30  31
Online Extras
Site Services
Around Bend
Outdoor Fun
Travel Info
Shop Local

Members Of

Poll: Today's Live Poll
Email to a friend | Print this | PDF version | Comments (4 posted) 
  Blogger |   del.icio.us |   digg |   newsvine

Jan 12,2007
Bush's totalization plan threatens Social Security
by Phyllis Schlafly

President George W. Bush's secret plan for Social Security has just been released to the public in response to a Freedom of Information lawsuit filed by TREA Senior Citizens League, a million-member seniors advocacy group.

For years the president carried on an energetic public relations campaign to promote his plan to privatize part of Social Security, but he kept under White House lock and key the "totalization" agreement his administration secretly made with Mexico in June 2004.

Is that any way to run the government, or to commit billions of taxpayer dollars? Maybe we have been needing Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., to demand "the most honest, most open" government in history.

If and when Bush personally signs this agreement, it will automatically become law without any congressional action. The law that would have allowed one House of Congress to reject it by a vote within 60 days is generally thought to violate the Supreme Court's 1983 decision in Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Chadha, which declared unconstitutional a one-House veto of a president's action.

Sen. John Ensign, R-Nev., has introduced Senate Bill 43 to require totalization agreements to be treated like bilateral trade agreements. His bill would permit a totalization agreement to go into effect only if affirmatively passed by both houses of Congress.

Unless we live in some sort of Bush dictatorship, that's the very least of what totalization should require. It ought to be considered a treaty and require approval by two-thirds of the U.S. Senate.

Totalization is the bureaucratic buzzword for the plan to put millions of illegal Mexican workers into the U.S. Social Security system. They would collect U.S. benefits based on their U.S earnings under false or stolen Social Security numbers plus alleged earnings in Mexico.

U.S. citizens must work 10 years to be eligible for Social Security benefits, but the totalization agreement would allow Mexicans to qualify with only 18 months of work in the United States, and pretend to make up the difference by assuming work in Mexico. It is highly doubtful that the illegal immigrants ever paid into a Mexican system for eight and a half years.

It could be "virtual" work or "virtual" payments (just like the "virtual" fence proposed for the U.S.-Mexico border, or the "virtual" law that promised to build one).

A 2003 Government Accountability Office report tactfully declined to comment on "the integrity of Mexico's social security data" and warned that the cost to U.S. taxpayers is "highly uncertain."

The United States has totalization agreements with 21 other countries in order to assure a pension to those few individuals who work in two countries (legally, of course) by "totalizing" their payments into the pension systems of both countries. All existing totalization agreements are with industrialized nations whose retirement systems are on a parity with that of the United States.

Mexican retirement benefits are not remotely equal to U.S. benefits. U.S. citizens receive benefits after working for 10 years, but Mexicans have to work 24 years before receiving benefits.

Mexican workers receive in retirement only what they paid in plus interest, whereas the U.S. Social Security system is skewed to give lower-wage earners benefits greatly in excess of what they and their employers contributed.

Mexico has two different retirement programs, one for public-sector employees, which is draining the Mexican national treasury, and one for private-sector workers, which covers only 40 percent of the work force. Most Mexicans who illegally entered the United States previously lived in poverty, where they were unemployed, or worked in the off-the-record economy, or worked for employers who did not pay taxes into a retirement system.

The Bush totalization plan would put millions of Mexicans onto the rolls of the U.S. Social Security system just as the baby boom generation retires. The White House won't deny that imposing higher taxes on U.S. workers is "on the table" to deal with the expected shortfall.

The Bush totalization plan would lure even more Mexicans into the United States illegally in the hope of amnesty and eligibility for Social Security benefits for themselves, as well as for their spouses and dependents who may never have lived in the United States.

Totalization is part and parcel of the Council on Foreign Relations five-year plan for the "establishment by 2010 of a North American economic and security community" with a common "outer security perimeter." The 59-page CFR document - which can claim Bush administration approval because it is posted on a U.S. State Department Web site - demands the implementation of "the Social Security Totalization Agreement negotiated between the United States and Mexico."

Americans should raise a mighty clamor to demand that President Bush NOT sign this billion-dollar rip-off of American taxpayers and senior citizens. Meanwhile, tell your Congressional representative to hurry up and pass the Ensign bill.


© Copley News Service
4205 times read

Related news
Immigration bill will raid pockets of U.S. taxpayers by Phyllis_Schlafly posted on Jun 01,2007

Senate immigration bill is a sellout, not reform by Phyllis_Schlafly posted on May 25,2007

Republicans know what they want in a presidential candidate by Phyllis_Schlafly posted on Nov 09,2007

Did you enjoy this article? Rating: 4.94Rating: 4.94Rating: 4.94Rating: 4.94Rating: 4.94 (total 246 votes)

  • Good article, as far as it went. While the author holds Bush responsible for this totalization plan, and he is, he is however not a stand alone concerning this mess with Social Security and the hoards of Illegal Aliens from Mexico which are ''going'' to be tapping into it, should this plan become law. For years, and years our Country has been cutting it's own throat with the wink, wink ''I thought my hired guys were legal they showed me a SS card. How'd I know they were Illegal Aliens, I'm not the document police'', bunch of crap. And then of course there are the ones that blatantly hire them without even pretending to wink. What the author fails to point out is that the rip off of the SS funds has been on going for a long while concering the Mexican Illegal Aliens. Here's how part of that rip off works: Old Jose (and they are many, many Old José's) who has a genuine SS number sends his children, nephews and whoever else who would use his number to work under and to pay into his account , illegally up here to work. This builds Jose's SS account up until he can draw the maxim amount of benefits at retirement age. Down here on this South West border it's quite a sight and quite a gridlock at the first of the months as all of these many Old José's make the dash across the border to their U.S. Post Office boxes to pick up the checks! Is Jose committing a crime? Your damn right he's committing a crime, but he has been trained and in fact encouraged to commit the crime by that of our government, both Federal and State in many cases. He and his children were encouraged to commit the first crime of entering our Country Illegally by way of the ole wink, wink come and work system. He was encouraged to commit his second crime by the U.S. Postal Service and the Department of Social Security who had been and still are operating under the ole wink, wink system. In actuality the two agencies and along with some other State and Federal agencies are also BLATANTLY enabling the both large and small scale Human Smuggling Organizations along our border here. The Postal Service performs this enabling by way of Postal Money Orders(which can only be bought with cash) which are used to launder the ill-gotten funds, and to supply ''drop boxes'' known as Post Office mail boxes, which assist in the collection of both Smuggling Fees and falsely obtained SS funds. Meanwhile, two other Government agencies, Border Patrol and BICE are sucking us dry playing the other end of the wink, wink game of ''catch and release'', and putting as few smugglers in jail as the game will allow. In the end it really doesn't matter if Bush signs this deal into law or not, they are already getting it with the blessing of an American public to busy winking to see straight! John
  • (Posted on January 13, 2007, 8:25 pm John)

  • I posted this article on digg.com, where you can vote whether you "digg" it or not -- more votes, more readers. Thanks for the excellent article.
  • (Posted on January 12, 2007, 7:12 pm flavia)

  • Gov. Ted wants Head Start-A program so Illegal Alien kids will be babysat by us Taxpayers, costing Millions. Gov. Ted wants to expand Health Care to all Kids, again another handout by US, mostly to Illegal Aliens. We already pay for thousands of Illegals to have thier babies on OHP and now we are going to pay from 3yr.s old education and all the way to Social Security? Our Gov't has gone insane with open borders ad every service they can make up to grow Gov't, meanwhile us that are stupid enough to work are the ones paying for all this baloney. BUILD A WALL & DEPORT THEM ALL! NOW!
  • (Posted on January 12, 2007, 10:27 am Rick Hickey)

  • I am stuned by this. I suppose I shouldn't be though. He's a bigger criminal and tool of international bankers, big oil, and big business than the Clintons. The Democrat and the Republican Parties should both be considered criminal organizations, bought and paid for by forieign governments and big international money. Makes you wonder though, what the Mexicans have on him or his family to make him more loyal to them than to the U.S. does'n it????
  • (Posted on January 12, 2007, 10:15 am Old Dave)

Market Information
Breaking News
Most Popular
Most Commented
Featured Columnist
Horoscope Guide
Aquarius Aquarius Libra Libra
Aries Aries Pisces Pisces
Cancer Cancer Sagittarius Sagittarius
Capricorn Capricorn Scorpio Scorpio
Gemini Gemini Taurus Taurus
Leo Leo Virgo Virgo
Local Attractions
Bend Visitors & Convention Bureau
Bend Visitors & Convention Bureau

Mt. Bachelor Resort
Mt. Bachelor Resort

Les Schwab Ampitheater
Les Schwab Ampitheater

Deschutes County Fairgrounds
Deschutes County

Tower Theatre
Tower Theatre

The High Desert Museum


Deschutes County

  Web    BendWeekly.com
© 2006 Bend Weekly News
A .Com Endeavors, Inc. Company.
All Rights Reserved. Terms under
which this service is provided to you.
Please read our Privacy Policy. Contact us.
Bend Weekly News & Event Guide Online
   Save the Net
External sites open in new window,
not endorsed by BendWeekly.com
Subscribe in NewsGator Online
Add to Google Add to MSN Add to My AOL
What are RSS headlines?