Weekly News via Email
   Set as homepage | Add to favorites | Customer Service | Subscribe Now | Place an Ad | Contact Us | Sitemap Saturday, 12.20.2014
Classifieds
News Archive
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
 1  2  3
 4  5  6  7  8  9  10
 11  12  13  14  15  16  17
 18  19  20  21  22  23  24
 25  26  27  28  29  30
Online Extras
Site Services
Around Bend
Outdoor Fun
Travel Info
Shop Local




Members Of



Poll: Today's Live Poll
Email to a friend | Print this | PDF version | Comments (0 posted) 
  Blogger |   del.icio.us |   digg |   newsvine

Nov 23,2007
Business as usual
by The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel

Maybe President Bush did betray his bias for the military over the economically distressed in his choice of vetoes last week. He sent back a $606 billion spending bill funding education, health and labor programs but signed a $471 billion defense appropriations bill funding the Pentagon, minus Afghanistan and Iraq operations.

But Congress gave him an opening so large that any president would feel tempted to drive a veto truck through. That would be 2,000 earmarks, including money for a library and museum honoring first ladies, the Charles B. Rangel Center for Public Service and the Thad Cochran Research Center.

The library and museum is courtesy of Rep. Ralph Regula, R-Ohio - the library founded by his wife and directed by his daughter, according to a New York Times article last week.

The president says he vetoed the non-military bill because it overshot what he wanted to spend. Yet he approved the military bill, though its spending represented an even larger increase. He seems to have very much found his budget outrage and veto pen with a Democratic Congress that he didn't much find when he had a big-spending GOP Congress to work with. So it's clear that part of his motivation is political.

That doesn't mean that Congress has to make it easy. After promising to curtail the practice of earmarks, it still managed to find a home for 2,000 of them in this bill. Perhaps there are even some in the bill that most folks would deem as worthy. But that isn't the point. Earmarks - pork to the rest of us - represent a longstanding congressional practice through its power of the purse to micromanage. Federal agencies and the president ask for a certain amount, and contained in what Congress sends back to them are funds directed toward specific projects, which often just happen to be in the districts of well-connected members of Congress.

Some put a high-minded constitutional spin on this - Congress, as opposed to faceless bureaucrats, being best able to ascertain the needs and wants of Americans. Direct democracy, in other words.

Bunk.

Pork is too often about desires of the well-favored put to the front of the line, without adequate vetting or skepticism. And earmarks might also be viewed as tantamount to a lobbyists/consultants employment security act.

So here's a suggestion. Since the domestic spending bill doesn't seem to have the votes to be veto- proof, strip out the pork. If nothing else, this would test whether the president's motivation is fiscal or purely political.

Reprinted from The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel – CNS.
764 times read

Related news
Why we secretly love earmarks by Roland_S_Martin posted on Mar 09,2009

Shame on Pelosi by The San Diego Union-Tribune posted on Mar 30,2007

Budget chicken by the St. Louis Post-Dispatch posted on Dec 14,2007

Congress sends budget to Bush by UPI posted on Dec 20,2007

Pork-barrel spending alive and well by UPI posted on May 21,2007

Did you enjoy this article? Rating: 5.00Rating: 5.00Rating: 5.00Rating: 5.00Rating: 5.00 (total 34 votes)

Market Information
Breaking News
Most Popular
Most Commented
Featured Columnist
Horoscope Guide
Aquarius Aquarius Libra Libra
Aries Aries Pisces Pisces
Cancer Cancer Sagittarius Sagittarius
Capricorn Capricorn Scorpio Scorpio
Gemini Gemini Taurus Taurus
Leo Leo Virgo Virgo
Local Attractions
Bend Visitors & Convention Bureau
Bend Visitors & Convention Bureau

Mt. Bachelor Resort
Mt. Bachelor Resort

Les Schwab Ampitheater
Les Schwab Ampitheater

Deschutes County Fairgrounds
Deschutes County
Fairgrounds

Tower Theatre
Tower Theatre

The High Desert Museum

Advertisements



Deschutes County

Google  
  Web    BendWeekly.com
© 2006 Bend Weekly News
A .Com Endeavors, Inc. Company.
All Rights Reserved. Terms under
which this service is provided to you.
Please read our Privacy Policy. Contact us.
Bend Weekly News & Event Guide Online
   Save the Net
Advertisement
External sites open in new window,
not endorsed by BendWeekly.com
Subscribe in NewsGator Online
Add to Google Add to MSN Add to My AOL
What are RSS headlines?