Weekly News via Email
   Set as homepage | Add to favorites | Customer Service | Subscribe Now | Place an Ad | Contact Us | Sitemap Tuesday, 09.02.2014
Classifieds
News Archive
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
 1
 2  3  4  5  6  7  8
 9  10  11  12  13  14  15
 16  17  18  19  20  21  22
 23  24  25  26  27  28  29
 30  31
Online Extras
Site Services
Around Bend
Outdoor Fun
Travel Info
Shop Local




Members Of



Poll: Today's Live Poll
Email to a friend | Print this | PDF version | Comments (0 posted) 
  Blogger |   del.icio.us |   digg |   newsvine

Dec 14,2007
Free the judges
by the St. Louis Post-Dispatch

It has been a good week for the concept that justice requires judges, not politicians, to have the final say in how criminals are punished.

- On Monday, the U.S. Supreme Court handed down a pair of 7-2 decisions that restored a measure of independence to federal trial judges in deciding how to assess punishment.

- On Tuesday, the U.S. Sentencing Commission, which sets guidelines for federal prison sentences, gave judges the right to reconsider sentences imposed in nearly 20,000 crack cocaine cases.

Lest anyone believe the Roberts court suddenly has gone soft, it should be pointed out that federal sentencing guidelines remain very tough. But in Monday's decision, both Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. and Justice Antonin Scalia, two of the court's four-member conservative bloc, were among the majority that built on the court's 2005 ruling that those guidelines are advisory, not mandatory. The rulings say that appeals courts must defer to the right of a trial judge to use his discretion in departing from sentencing guidelines.

Although both of the cases decided Monday involved drugs, the ruling applies to sentences for other crimes as well. Still, it's significant that one of the cases directly addressed the 20-year controversy over disparities in sentences imposed for crimes involving crack cocaine as opposed to those associated with powder cocaine.

Congress, in enacting federal sentencing laws in 1986 and 1988, bought into the prevailing mythology that when powdered cocaine is crystallized with water and baking soda into rock form and then smoked, it becomes far more dangerous. The sentencing laws set a mandatory minimum sentence of five years for anyone convicted of possessing as little five grams (about the weight of a nickel) of crack. To get the same sentence, someone would have had to be convicted of possessing 100 times that much powder cocaine (more than a pound) and the intent to distribute it.

By 1995, the sentencing commission had concluded that the devastation created in urban areas in the 1980s had been created not by the drug itself but by competition for control of the market for a cheap version of cocaine. But by then, prisons were filling up with crackheads, 85 percent of whom were African-American.

In the case decided Monday, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, writing for the majority, called the federal crack law "disproportionate and unjust." However, the decision merely affirmed the trial judge's sentence of 15 years, rather than the 19 1/2 to 22 years called for under the sentencing guidelines.

Similarly, under the ruling announced Tuesday by the sentencing commission, trial judges won't be emptying jail cells en masse. The average sentence could end up being reduced by about 17 percent, or about two years.

The next logical step in this progression belongs to Congress, which for years has been considering reducing the sentencing disparities for crack and powder cocaine convictions. No one is suggesting that drug dealers get a free pass; the argument is that it's foolish to fill up prisons with addicts who are serving longer sentences than the dealers who supplied them.

But Congress is full of politicians, a breed that too often puts the interests of politics over the interests of justice. This is why judges at the federal and state levels, too, should be free from political meddlers.

Reprinted from the St. Louis Post-Dispatch CNS.

789 times read

Related news
Lower sentences for crack effective Monday by UPI posted on Mar 03,2008

Panel may cut federal prison terms by UPI posted on Nov 13,2007

Recent crack cocaine ruling brings early Christmas present by Marc_H._Morial posted on Dec 28,2007

Fairer sentencing by The San Diego Union-Tribune posted on Nov 15,2007

Some drug offenders may be released early by UPI posted on Nov 12,2007

Did you enjoy this article? Rating: 5.00Rating: 5.00Rating: 5.00Rating: 5.00Rating: 5.00 (total 8 votes)

Market Information
Breaking News
Most Popular
Most Commented
Featured Columnist
Horoscope Guide
Aquarius Aquarius Libra Libra
Aries Aries Pisces Pisces
Cancer Cancer Sagittarius Sagittarius
Capricorn Capricorn Scorpio Scorpio
Gemini Gemini Taurus Taurus
Leo Leo Virgo Virgo
Local Attractions
Bend Visitors & Convention Bureau
Bend Visitors & Convention Bureau

Mt. Bachelor Resort
Mt. Bachelor Resort

Les Schwab Ampitheater
Les Schwab Ampitheater

Deschutes County Fairgrounds
Deschutes County
Fairgrounds

Tower Theatre
Tower Theatre

The High Desert Museum

Advertisements



Deschutes County

Google  
  Web    BendWeekly.com
© 2006 Bend Weekly News
A .Com Endeavors, Inc. Company.
All Rights Reserved. Terms under
which this service is provided to you.
Please read our Privacy Policy. Contact us.
Bend Weekly News & Event Guide Online
   Save the Net
Advertisement
External sites open in new window,
not endorsed by BendWeekly.com
Subscribe in NewsGator Online
Add to Google Add to MSN Add to My AOL
What are RSS headlines?