Weekly News via Email
   Set as homepage | Add to favorites | Customer Service | Subscribe Now | Place an Ad | Contact Us | Sitemap Thursday, 04.17.2014
Classifieds
News Archive
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
 1  2  3  4  5
 6  7  8  9  10  11  12
 13  14  15  16  17  18  19
 20  21  22  23  24  25  26
 27  28  29  30  31
Online Extras
Site Services
Around Bend
Outdoor Fun
Travel Info
Shop Local




Members Of



Poll: Today's Live Poll
Email to a friend | Print this | PDF version | Comments (1 posted) 
  Blogger |   del.icio.us |   digg |   newsvine

Jan 11,2008
Flea market economics
by the St. Louis Post-Dispatch

"The first thing I'd love to do as president: Put a 'Going out of business' sign on the Internal Revenue Service"

So says Mike Huckabee, the victor in the Republican Iowa caucuses who was among the front-runners in the New Hampshire Primary. It's an effective applause line, particularly in tax-averse New Hampshire. But it's a troubling statement and would be disastrous policy.

If elected president, the former Arkansas governor wants to abolish income and payroll taxes on individuals and corporations. Gone would be all taxes on pay, interest, capital gains and estates. The IRS would disappear. Instead, everyone would pay a massive 23 percent retail sales tax on all the goods they buy. Huckabee calls it the "fair tax," but it's anything but. It would be wonderful for the wealthy, but disastrous for working-class and middle-class Americans. It runs starkly counter to Huckabee's populist image. It is so poorly conceived that it suggests he may not be ready for prime time.

Huckabee built a solid record in Arkansas. He added children to the state health care rolls, built roads and made the public schools more efficient. He governed as a true compassionate conservative.

But as he moves onto the national stage, his prescriptions for America deserve more attention. His vision for the tax system is scary.

Sales taxes are regressive, meaning that they bite harder at the poor, the working poor and the middle class than at the wealthy. This happens for two reasons: Most Americans spend nearly their entire paycheck every month, most of it on the basics: food, clothing and shelter. The nation's personal savings rate is near zero. So most Americans will be paying the 23 percent sales tax on the great bulk of their income.

By contrast, the well-off have incomes far beyond their needs. They save and invest much of their money. Under Huckabee, savings and investment income won't be taxed. So the wealthy will pay taxes on a smaller part of what they earn. The well-off also spend more on services, while the average citizen buys mostly goods. Sales taxes cover goods but relatively few services, pushing more of the burden on folks in the middle class and below. For example, a middle class homeowner pays sales tax on his new lawn mower, but the wealthy man's lawn service would come tax-free.

A family smack in the middle of the income spectrum now pays 14 percent of its income in federal taxes, according to the Congressional Budget Office. Trading a 14 percent income tax for a 23 percent sales tax is a raw deal, particularly for the working poor. They often pay no income taxes but get a refund anyway through the earned income tax credit. Under the "fair tax," they'd have no income tax or refund.

Huckabee would lessen this effect by rebating sales taxes to everyone until their spending reaches the poverty level, about $17,000 for a family of three. Used goods, such as used cars, wouldn't be taxed. That might be a boon to flea markets, but his plan is a huge shift in tax burden off the well-to-do onto nearly everyone else.

Huckabee says a 23 percent tax would be "revenue neutral," meaning it would bring in the same amount of money as today's tax system. Other economists think the rate would have to hit 50 percent to raise the same revenue, considering Huckabee's rebate plan.

How would you like to pay a 50 percent federal tax on your next grocery bill, with local sales taxes added on top?

The Huckabee plan is based on the theory that by taxing consumption, rather than income, we encourage savings and investment, and that leads to economic growth. It's the old trickle-down theory, and it doesn't work. In fact, the grand economic boom of the 1990s occurred when income and investment taxes were considerably higher.

Simply put, Huckabee's plan would make life unaffordable for millions of Americans. The fact that he doesn't comprehend this raises profound questions about his grasp of economics.

Reprinted from the St. Louis Post-Dispatch – CNS.

592 times read

Related news
Tax cutting away the middle class by Juan Carlos Ordóñez posted on Nov 23,2007

Poll: Income taxes viewed positively by UPI posted on Apr 14,2009

Richer and richer by the St. Louis Post-Dispatch posted on Jan 04,2008

A boost up the ladder by the St. Louis Post-Dispatch posted on Feb 15,2008

Obama budget is too heavy on taxes, spending by The Detroit News posted on Mar 04,2009

Did you enjoy this article? Rating: 5.00Rating: 5.00Rating: 5.00Rating: 5.00Rating: 5.00 (total 23 votes)

  • This is a fairly simplistic response to very thoughtful proposal made by Gov. Huckabee and Americans for Fair Taxation (www.fairtax.org). First, this proposal is not regressive at all. The poor would receive a monthly "prebate" check which would effectively return to them the taxed amounts they spend for necessities like food, clothing and the basics ... the net result being that the poor would effectively pay no tax at all. (Which would be a better result than the current system under which the poor currently pay gas taxes and payroll taxes and have corporate taxes built into the prices they pay.) Second, while the article emphasized over and over the size of the sales tax, no mention was made of (i) the fact that every wage earner would earn all of their paycheck (plus the additional 7.5% the employer pays in payroll taxes), (ii) the fact that prices would drop because gas taxes and corporate taxes would no longer be built in, and (iii) the fact that taxpayers (corporate and individual) would no longer need to spend the time and money each year preparing tax returns or making various plans to avoid or reduce taxes. It is a shame that the authors of this article did not take more time to truly understand the proposal before attacking Governor Huckabee for a truly refreshing idea to simplify the tax code and build a system that encourages hard work and saving rather than penalizes it.
  • (Posted on January 14, 2008, 9:13 am Gideon)

Market Information
Breaking News
Most Popular
Most Commented
Featured Columnist
Horoscope Guide
Aquarius Aquarius Libra Libra
Aries Aries Pisces Pisces
Cancer Cancer Sagittarius Sagittarius
Capricorn Capricorn Scorpio Scorpio
Gemini Gemini Taurus Taurus
Leo Leo Virgo Virgo
Local Attractions
Bend Visitors & Convention Bureau
Bend Visitors & Convention Bureau

Mt. Bachelor Resort
Mt. Bachelor Resort

Les Schwab Ampitheater
Les Schwab Ampitheater

Deschutes County Fairgrounds
Deschutes County
Fairgrounds

Tower Theatre
Tower Theatre

The High Desert Museum

Advertisements



Deschutes County

Google  
  Web    BendWeekly.com
© 2006 Bend Weekly News
A .Com Endeavors, Inc. Company.
All Rights Reserved. Terms under
which this service is provided to you.
Please read our Privacy Policy. Contact us.
Bend Weekly News & Event Guide Online
   Save the Net
Advertisement
External sites open in new window,
not endorsed by BendWeekly.com
Subscribe in NewsGator Online
Add to Google Add to MSN Add to My AOL
What are RSS headlines?