Weekly News via Email
   Set as homepage | Add to favorites | Customer Service | Subscribe Now | Place an Ad | Contact Us | Sitemap Saturday, 01.20.2018
News Archive
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
 1  2  3  4  5
 6  7  8  9  10  11  12
 13  14  15  16  17  18  19
 20  21  22  23  24  25  26
 27  28  29  30  31
Online Extras
Site Services
Around Bend
Outdoor Fun
Travel Info
Shop Local

Members Of

Poll: Today's Live Poll
Email to a friend | Print this | PDF version | Comments (0 posted) 
  Blogger |   del.icio.us |   digg |   newsvine

Jan 18,2008
Warding off recession
by The San Diego Union-Tribune

A markedly slowing economy and the fear of recession are producing a flurry of economic stimulus proposals - from congressional Democrats, from Hillary Rodham Clinton and Barack Obama and, in the talking stage at least, from the Bush White House. It's time for a brief discussion of some basics about what might work and what wouldn't.

The starting point for any such deliberation should be recognition that we're dealing here with an annual economy of $14 trillion. So a fiscal stimulus package that adds, say, $100 billion in federal spending intended as pump priming couldn't accomplish much, even assuming it could be negotiated, drafted, debated and enacted in time to arrive before any prospective recession had largely run its course.

Point two is that pump priming as an anti-recession measure has a very mixed track record, at best. Indeed, more than a few economists think a fiscal stimulus package would be both unneeded and unhelpful. But that's not to say nothing can be done, either to head off a recession or to soften its impact if one occurs. Making the Bush tax-rate cuts of 2003 permanent would head off the looming sharp increase in marginal tax rates, a sure growth and jobs killer, when they are due to expire in 2010. Lower tax rates on capital gains and dividends would increase investment incentives, a certain spur to economic growth. Lowering corporate tax rates - an idea embraced by House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Rep. Charles Rangel, a liberal Democrat from New York - would help American business against its foreign competitors, most of whom pay far lower rates.

An idea that strikes us as particularly inventive would be to increase the investment tax credit or speed up tax deductions for new investments in machinery and equipment. The latter has been tried successfully several times since it first worked during the Kennedy administration in the early 1960s.

The point here is that real stimulus must be structural, not merely a fiscal dollop.

Reprinted from The San Diego Union-Tribune – CNS.


791 times read

Related news
More bucks, less bang by the St. Louis Post-Dispatch posted on Feb 08,2008

A jolt from Washington by the St. Louis Post-Dispatch posted on Jan 11,2008

Tax rebates, breaks part of Bush plan by UPI posted on Jan 18,2008

What would Ronald Reagan do? by Jack_Kemp posted on May 04,2007

Did you enjoy this article? Rating: 5.00Rating: 5.00Rating: 5.00Rating: 5.00Rating: 5.00 (total 12 votes)

Market Information
Breaking News
Most Popular
Most Commented
Featured Columnist
Horoscope Guide
Aquarius Aquarius Libra Libra
Aries Aries Pisces Pisces
Cancer Cancer Sagittarius Sagittarius
Capricorn Capricorn Scorpio Scorpio
Gemini Gemini Taurus Taurus
Leo Leo Virgo Virgo
Local Attractions
Bend Visitors & Convention Bureau
Bend Visitors & Convention Bureau

Mt. Bachelor Resort
Mt. Bachelor Resort

Les Schwab Ampitheater
Les Schwab Ampitheater

Deschutes County Fairgrounds
Deschutes County

Tower Theatre
Tower Theatre

The High Desert Museum


Deschutes County

  Web    BendWeekly.com
© 2006 Bend Weekly News
A .Com Endeavors, Inc. Company.
All Rights Reserved. Terms under
which this service is provided to you.
Please read our Privacy Policy. Contact us.
Bend Weekly News & Event Guide Online
   Save the Net
External sites open in new window,
not endorsed by BendWeekly.com
Subscribe in NewsGator Online
Add to Google Add to MSN Add to My AOL
What are RSS headlines?