Weekly News via Email
   Set as homepage | Add to favorites | Customer Service | Subscribe Now | Place an Ad | Contact Us | Sitemap Saturday, 12.16.2017
News Archive
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
 1  2  3  4  5
 6  7  8  9  10  11  12
 13  14  15  16  17  18  19
 20  21  22  23  24  25  26
 27  28  29  30  31
Online Extras
Site Services
Around Bend
Outdoor Fun
Travel Info
Shop Local

Members Of

Poll: Today's Live Poll
Email to a friend | Print this | PDF version | Comments (0 posted) 
  Blogger |   del.icio.us |   digg |   newsvine

Jan 18,2008
Enough, already
by The San Diego Union-Tribune

If ever there were a situation so vividly captured by Macbeth's "full of sound and fury, signifying nothing" (or very little), it is the exchange between Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton and Sen. Barack Obama in their campaign for the Democratic nomination for president. Suddenly, two wars, a weakening economy, health care and climate change are pushed off the presidential stage.

This started when former President Bill Clinton took a verbal jab at Obama's account of his early war opposition, branding it a "fairy tale." But what Hillary Clinton said in a televised interview has been getting most of the attention: "Dr. King's dream began to be realized when President Lyndon Johnson passed the Civil Rights Act of 1964 .... It took a president to get it done."

While some took offense at the King remark as marginalizing the efforts of the great civil rights leader, Hillary Clinton actually did no such thing. King had been in a long struggle to gain equal treatment under the law for African-Americans, starting when he went to Montgomery, Ala., in 1955 as a young minister to take over a bus boycott.

Between the bus boycott and the signing of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, the nation went through many changes, both social - which King was greatly responsible for - and political, some of that started by John F. Kennedy but most done by Lyndon Johnson.

Even with the monumental efforts of King and many other civil rights leaders, the legislation likely would not have gotten past Southern conservatives in the Senate, where Johnson skillfully had served as majority leader. King made it clear during the 1964 presidential campaign that electing Johnson over Barry Goldwater was crucial to progress in civil rights.

In 2008, whether King or Johnson was more important to the civil rights movement is not an argument worth having, particularly if the goal is to inject race into the presidential campaign.

Reprinted from The San Diego Union-Tribune – CNS.


907 times read

Related news
Obama criticizes Clinton over MLK remarks by UPI posted on Jan 13,2008

Democrats trade barbs in debate by UPI posted on Jan 16,2008

At no one's expense by The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel posted on Jan 18,2008

Confidant: King would be saddened by UPI posted on Apr 04,2008

Did you enjoy this article? Rating: 5.00Rating: 5.00Rating: 5.00Rating: 5.00Rating: 5.00 (total 32 votes)

Market Information
Breaking News
Most Popular
Most Commented
Featured Columnist
Horoscope Guide
Aquarius Aquarius Libra Libra
Aries Aries Pisces Pisces
Cancer Cancer Sagittarius Sagittarius
Capricorn Capricorn Scorpio Scorpio
Gemini Gemini Taurus Taurus
Leo Leo Virgo Virgo
Local Attractions
Bend Visitors & Convention Bureau
Bend Visitors & Convention Bureau

Mt. Bachelor Resort
Mt. Bachelor Resort

Les Schwab Ampitheater
Les Schwab Ampitheater

Deschutes County Fairgrounds
Deschutes County

Tower Theatre
Tower Theatre

The High Desert Museum


Deschutes County

  Web    BendWeekly.com
© 2006 Bend Weekly News
A .Com Endeavors, Inc. Company.
All Rights Reserved. Terms under
which this service is provided to you.
Please read our Privacy Policy. Contact us.
Bend Weekly News & Event Guide Online
   Save the Net
External sites open in new window,
not endorsed by BendWeekly.com
Subscribe in NewsGator Online
Add to Google Add to MSN Add to My AOL
What are RSS headlines?