Weekly News via Email
   Set as homepage | Add to favorites | Customer Service | Subscribe Now | Place an Ad | Contact Us | Sitemap Sunday, 02.18.2018
News Archive
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
 1  2  3  4  5
 6  7  8  9  10  11  12
 13  14  15  16  17  18  19
 20  21  22  23  24  25  26
 27  28  29  30  31
Online Extras
Site Services
Around Bend
Outdoor Fun
Travel Info
Shop Local

Members Of

Poll: Today's Live Poll
Email to a friend | Print this | PDF version | Comments (0 posted) 
  Blogger |   del.icio.us |   digg |   newsvine

Jan 25,2008
Sound exemptions
by The San Diego Union-Tribune

To bash President Bush for exempting the Navy from two environmental laws on national security grounds is to ignore the imperative for those exemptions.

The president's justifiable reasons for acting negate the impact of a misguided suit led by the environmentalist group Natural Resources Defense Council, a representative of which says the Navy kills whales with its sonar training "for the sake of convenience."

And they negate unreasonable rulings by a federal judge. Her initial order prohibited sonar training in the Navy's ongoing exercises off the Southern California coast. After an appeal, she merely crippled those exercises with unneeded mandates. The suit and the judge ignored the Navy's extensive procedures, based on science, to protect marine life. They also ignored the national security need for expertise in the sonar that best detects the new "silent" submarines and mines.

The Navy has been spending $10 million a year for university and ocean research on this sonar's impact on sea life. Since the one proven instance in 2000 of a whale's beaching itself because of sonar training, the Navy has developed 29 measures to minimize adverse effects.

When the NRDC, the California Coastal Commission and a federal district court maintain that "the Navy can carry out its mission as well as protect the whales" - but only under these opponents' direction - we have to wonder at their blithe dismissal of the Navy's protections and their dubious assumption of their own superior knowledge of the Navy's needs.

The Constitution provides for the common defense. Our world has always required a well-trained military. Pit sailors' welfare in training and war against whales' health and sailors win. The Navy is trying to avoid that choice. Environmentalists and courts should, too.

Reprinted from The San Diego Union-Tribune – CNS.

910 times read

Related news
Sonar waiver for Navy is ruled invalid by judge by Terry Rodgers - CNS posted on Feb 08,2008

Ruling curbs Navy sonar off Calif. coast by UPI posted on Jan 04,2008

Navy sued twice over sonar use near coast by Terry Rodgers posted on Mar 23,2007

Judge overrules Bush on Navy sonar ban by UPI posted on Feb 05,2008

Judges hold no rank in military chain of command by Phyllis_Schlafly posted on Feb 15,2008

Did you enjoy this article? Rating: 5.00Rating: 5.00Rating: 5.00Rating: 5.00Rating: 5.00 (total 7 votes)

Market Information
Breaking News
Most Popular
Most Commented
Featured Columnist
Horoscope Guide
Aquarius Aquarius Libra Libra
Aries Aries Pisces Pisces
Cancer Cancer Sagittarius Sagittarius
Capricorn Capricorn Scorpio Scorpio
Gemini Gemini Taurus Taurus
Leo Leo Virgo Virgo
Local Attractions
Bend Visitors & Convention Bureau
Bend Visitors & Convention Bureau

Mt. Bachelor Resort
Mt. Bachelor Resort

Les Schwab Ampitheater
Les Schwab Ampitheater

Deschutes County Fairgrounds
Deschutes County

Tower Theatre
Tower Theatre

The High Desert Museum


Deschutes County

  Web    BendWeekly.com
© 2006 Bend Weekly News
A .Com Endeavors, Inc. Company.
All Rights Reserved. Terms under
which this service is provided to you.
Please read our Privacy Policy. Contact us.
Bend Weekly News & Event Guide Online
   Save the Net
External sites open in new window,
not endorsed by BendWeekly.com
Subscribe in NewsGator Online
Add to Google Add to MSN Add to My AOL
What are RSS headlines?