Weekly News via Email
   Set as homepage | Add to favorites | Customer Service | Subscribe Now | Place an Ad | Contact Us | Sitemap Saturday, 08.23.2014
Classifieds
News Archive
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
 1  2  3
 4  5  6  7  8  9  10
 11  12  13  14  15  16  17
 18  19  20  21  22  23  24
 25  26  27  28  29  30  31
Online Extras
Site Services
Around Bend
Outdoor Fun
Travel Info
Shop Local




Members Of



Poll: Today's Live Poll
Email to a friend | Print this | PDF version | Comments (0 posted) 
  Blogger |   del.icio.us |   digg |   newsvine

May 16,2008
Obama plan could help with fuel rules
by The Detroit News

Campaigning in Michigan has a way of softening the views of presidential candidates toward the auto industry. That's certainly true of Sen. Barack Obama, who proposed billions in spending programs that could help the industry.

To the extent that his proposals assist the automakers in paying for the costs of the federal government's fuel efficiency mandates, they make sense and will be useful. But targeting specific technologies for investment remains problematic.

The Illinois Democrat, now his party's likely presidential nominee, has had some harsh words for the industry as recently as this month. But in appearances around the state this week, Obama praised the auto industry for making progress in developing more fuel-efficient vehicles.

He specifically advocated spending part of a 10-year, $150 billion clean energy program on helping the industry retool for building alternative fuel cars; disbursing part of a $10-billion venture capital fund to move environmentally friendly auto technology from lab to market and adding funding to a federal program aimed at assisting manufacturing firms improve technology or efficiency. In the short term, however, the industry is confronted with accelerated new requirements that will cost an estimated $30 billion between now and 2015 to improve average fuel efficiency for autos to 35.7 miles per gallon from the current 27.5 miles per gallon rule. Ultimately, cars and trucks will have to meet an average of 35 miles per gallon by 2020. The total cost for this mandate is estimated at $85 billion.

Recently, U.S. Rep. Joe Knollenberg, R-Mich., proposed a plan for the auto industry that would provide federal assistance to the auto industry's fuel efficiency research through refundable tax credits, which are a form of payment.

Like Obama's plan for the development of clean fuel and technology, Knollenberg proposed additional spending to promote research for specific kinds of fuels - in his case advanced batteries and hydrogen.

The part of Obama's plan that could be most immediately useful is assistance to manufacturers in improving technology, which could be applied to the fuel economy mandates. As we contended with Knollenberg's plan, assistance for different fuel technologies ought to be free to follow the most promising research rather than trying to guess which will pay off in advance.

The Illinois senator rightly rejected plans by his rivals for a fuel-tax holiday this summer. The most effective way to promote fuel conservation is to keep gas prices high through higher taxes that could fund fuel efficiency research. Obama also praised Gov. Jennifer Granholm's 21st Century Jobs Fund, which, among other things, places targeted investments in particular firms. The Michigan Economic Development Corp. says the program, which has disbursed about $126 million so far, has generated about 400 jobs. It is too early to tell if it will be a success.

Obama should wait to see whether the program works in Michigan before expanding it nationwide.

The effectiveness of prior grants in spurring economic growth is questionable. As Scott Watkins, a member of the Anderson Economics Group consulting firm told The News, government has a role in funding university research and national labs, but it has a poor record of predicting which firms will produce scientific breakthroughs.

At least Obama has recognized that the auto industry needs help and put out an olive branch on his visit here.

Reprinted from The Detroit News – CNS.

1353 times read

Related news
Not rocket science by the St. Louis Post Dispatch posted on Jun 15,2007

Energy bill does little more than bash autos by The Detroit News posted on Dec 14,2007

Green push by Congress hurts Big 3 automakers by The Detroit News posted on May 11,2007

Bush's fuel economy goals will ruin auto industry by The Detroit News posted on May 18,2007

President should stop badmouthing Big 3 by The Detroit News posted on Apr 03,2009

Did you enjoy this article? Rating: 5.00Rating: 5.00Rating: 5.00Rating: 5.00Rating: 5.00 (total 33 votes)

Market Information
Breaking News
Most Popular
Most Commented
Featured Columnist
Horoscope Guide
Aquarius Aquarius Libra Libra
Aries Aries Pisces Pisces
Cancer Cancer Sagittarius Sagittarius
Capricorn Capricorn Scorpio Scorpio
Gemini Gemini Taurus Taurus
Leo Leo Virgo Virgo
Local Attractions
Bend Visitors & Convention Bureau
Bend Visitors & Convention Bureau

Mt. Bachelor Resort
Mt. Bachelor Resort

Les Schwab Ampitheater
Les Schwab Ampitheater

Deschutes County Fairgrounds
Deschutes County
Fairgrounds

Tower Theatre
Tower Theatre

The High Desert Museum

Advertisements



Deschutes County

Google  
  Web    BendWeekly.com
© 2006 Bend Weekly News
A .Com Endeavors, Inc. Company.
All Rights Reserved. Terms under
which this service is provided to you.
Please read our Privacy Policy. Contact us.
Bend Weekly News & Event Guide Online
   Save the Net
Advertisement
External sites open in new window,
not endorsed by BendWeekly.com
Subscribe in NewsGator Online
Add to Google Add to MSN Add to My AOL
What are RSS headlines?