Weekly News via Email
   Set as homepage | Add to favorites | Customer Service | Subscribe Now | Place an Ad | Contact Us | Sitemap Wednesday, 09.17.2014
Classifieds
News Archive
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
 1  2  3  4  5  6  7
 8  9  10  11  12  13  14
 15  16  17  18  19  20  21
 22  23  24  25  26  27  28
 29  30  31
Online Extras
Site Services
Around Bend
Outdoor Fun
Travel Info
Shop Local




Members Of



Poll: Today's Live Poll
Email to a friend | Print this | PDF version | Comments (0 posted) 
  Blogger |   del.icio.us |   digg |   newsvine

Mar 27,2009
‘Opt in’ to fairness on bank overdraft fees
by The St. Louis Post-Dispatch

Banks levy about $17.5 billion each year in fees for overdrawn accounts, whether by bounced check, debit card purchase, cash withdrawal from an ATM or electronic payments of bills. That’s chump change compared to the hundreds of billions of dollars banks have received from various federal bailout programs.

But both are a product of greed run amok.

Bank customers are abused by fee structures that are as dishonorable as the AIG bonuses. But that may be about to change, thanks to rules changes being proposed by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. The board wants customers to be given the choice of signing up for overdraft programs, instead of being enrolled automatically and not given advance notice that a transaction will result in an overdraft and extra fee.

Banks charge $30 or more for each overdraft and design their programs to maximize the number of overdrafts. The most notorious practice:  When clearing an account on a given day, banks debit the largest payments first — regardless of the chronological order of transactions.

Say a customer with $450 in her account withdraws $20 from the ATM; uses her debit card to make a $6 purchase at a fast-food restaurant; writes a $30 check to pay her light bill and then, thinking her paycheck has cleared, pays her rent with a $475 check. The bank debits the $475 first so that it can charge its customer four overdraft fees.

Banks sometimes are the direct cause of an overdraft by holding checks for unreasonably long periods before crediting them to the customers’ accounts.

Banks say overdraft protection provides customers a valuable service, protecting their credit ratings and the embarrassment of a bounced payment. The reality, though, is that banks have chosen the most expensive and onerous means of providing such a “service.”

If banks genuinely were interested in serving customers, they would steer customers toward linking overdrafts to a credit card account. But that would mean much less profit for the bank.

The Fed has proposed two options to deal with this problem:

• One would give customers the right to opt out of a bank’s overdraft program. The bank would have to give customers clear notice of this right and how to exercise it before they could charge for any overdraft.

• The other would require that customers specifically opt-in to the overdraft program with full knowledge of the program’s terms and fee structure.

The opt-in approach is by far superior. It makes customers take full responsibility for their decision, instead of letting the overdraft program take over by default.

But the opt-in option can improved. Banks should be denied overdraft fees on existing customers’ accounts until the customers specifically opt in to the program. Banks also should be required to inform customers of less costly options for protecting accounts from overdrafts, such as linking them to a credit card. They should disclose the fact that an overdraft fee actually is a short term loan with interest rates that would make a loan shark blush.

Bank customers tired of being ripped off can have a say. The Fed is soliciting consumer comments on how best to reform the system. The deadline is March 30.

E-mail comments to regs.comments@federalreserve.gov. Put “Docket No. R-1343” in the subject line.

Reprinted From The St. Louis Post-Dispatch. Distributed By Creators Syndicate Inc.
633 times read

Related news
Bend adds online debit, credit card payment option for utilities by Bend_Weekly_News_Sources posted on Feb 26,2007


West Coast Bank to offer coin counting machines by Bend_Weekly_News_Sources posted on Apr 06,2007

Survey: Average Bounced-Check/Non Sufficient Funds Fees at Record High by Bend Weekly News Sources posted on Nov 17,2006

Access to Child Support Payments in Oregon Improved by Bend Weekly News Sources posted on Dec 22,2006

Did you enjoy this article? Rating: 5.00Rating: 5.00Rating: 5.00Rating: 5.00Rating: 5.00 (total 16 votes)

Market Information
Breaking News
Most Popular
Most Commented
Featured Columnist
Horoscope Guide
Aquarius Aquarius Libra Libra
Aries Aries Pisces Pisces
Cancer Cancer Sagittarius Sagittarius
Capricorn Capricorn Scorpio Scorpio
Gemini Gemini Taurus Taurus
Leo Leo Virgo Virgo
Local Attractions
Bend Visitors & Convention Bureau
Bend Visitors & Convention Bureau

Mt. Bachelor Resort
Mt. Bachelor Resort

Les Schwab Ampitheater
Les Schwab Ampitheater

Deschutes County Fairgrounds
Deschutes County
Fairgrounds

Tower Theatre
Tower Theatre

The High Desert Museum

Advertisements



Deschutes County

Google  
  Web    BendWeekly.com
© 2006 Bend Weekly News
A .Com Endeavors, Inc. Company.
All Rights Reserved. Terms under
which this service is provided to you.
Please read our Privacy Policy. Contact us.
Bend Weekly News & Event Guide Online
   Save the Net
Advertisement
External sites open in new window,
not endorsed by BendWeekly.com
Subscribe in NewsGator Online
Add to Google Add to MSN Add to My AOL
What are RSS headlines?