Weekly News via Email
   Set as homepage | Add to favorites | Customer Service | Subscribe Now | Place an Ad | Contact Us | Sitemap Saturday, 01.20.2018
News Archive
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
 1  2  3  4
 5  6  7  8  9  10  11
 12  13  14  15  16  17  18
 19  20  21  22  23  24  25
 26  27  28  29  30
Online Extras
Site Services
Around Bend
Outdoor Fun
Travel Info
Shop Local

Members Of

Poll: Today's Live Poll
Email to a friend | Print this | PDF version | Comments (0 posted) 
  Blogger |   del.icio.us |   digg |   newsvine

Apr 13,2009
Gates signals revolution in pentagon spending
by The St. Louis Post-Dispatch

In his farewell address as president, Dwight Eisenhower, who knew a thing or two about war, coined the phrase "military-industrial complex" to describe the "conjunction of an immense military establishment and a large arms industry ... new in the American experience."

As Eisenhower, the pride of Abilene, Kan., warned, "The total influence — economic, political, even spiritual — is felt in every city, every statehouse, every office of the federal government. ... Our toil, resources and livelihood are all involved; so is the very structure of our society."

This week, another Kansas Republican, Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates, took dead aim at Ike's nemesis by proposing to shift Pentagon spending priorities away from big-ticket weapons systems. He and Obama want to spend far less on strategic weapons and more on military manpower and tactical weapons used in counter-insurgency warfare.

Overall military spending — $664 billion next year, including the cost of the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq — would increase by 4 percent, but priorities would change. This revolution has been talked about for a long time, but the military-industrial complex and its allies in Congress have always beaten it back.

To be sure, they may beat it back this time, but odds are Gates and Obama will get most of what they asked for. With the federal budget already in record deficit, there's no way to pay for exotic weapons and increased manpower and readiness, too. Gates and Obama are right in their priorities.

This is a signal moment in the long battle to fix military procurement policies. Pentagon weapons systems are, collectively, nearly $300 billion over budget. Accountability is negligible. The system requires sound military and budgetary assessments and continual oversight. What Gates did this week, at long last, is a move in the right direction.

The most high-profile target on Mr. Gates' hit list is the Air Force's F-22 Raptor, a fighter plane so advanced that no other plane in the world is likely to touch it for at least 20 years. The Air Force wants 381 of them, but Gates wants to end production at 187. Reason: They cost $179 million each; $350 million each when development costs are rolled in.

Lockheed-Martin is the prime contractor for the F-22; Boeing's St. Louis-based defense unit is a major subcontractor, though few jobs here would be affected. Boeing also would be a loser in Gates' decision to whack $87 billion from the Army's Future Combat System contract for an eight-soldier high-tech fighting vehicle. Boeing St. Louis will continue to build 35 more F/A-18 Super Hornets for the Navy.

The military-industrial complex will fight these and other cuts with every weapon in its arsenal - lobbying campaigns, ad campaigns and political contributions. Too much is at stake to fall for facile arguments.

What Eisenhower said in 1961 still is true today: "Only an alert and knowledgeable citizenry can compel the proper meshing of the huge industrial and military machinery of defense with our peaceful methods and goals so that security and liberty may prosper together."

Reprinted From The St. Louis Post-Dispatch. Distributed By Creators Syndicate Inc.
984 times read

Related news
Gates praises Indonesian military by UPI posted on Feb 26,2008

How much is enough? by the St. Louis Post-Dispatch posted on Jan 25,2008

Gates: U.S.-India link not tied to China by UPI posted on Feb 27,2008

Gates urges quick end to Turkish incursion by UPI posted on Feb 28,2008

Don't stiff our troops by The St. Louis Post-Dispatch posted on Mar 16,2009

Did you enjoy this article? Rating: 5.00Rating: 5.00Rating: 5.00Rating: 5.00Rating: 5.00 (total 4 votes)

Market Information
Breaking News
Most Popular
Most Commented
Featured Columnist
Horoscope Guide
Aquarius Aquarius Libra Libra
Aries Aries Pisces Pisces
Cancer Cancer Sagittarius Sagittarius
Capricorn Capricorn Scorpio Scorpio
Gemini Gemini Taurus Taurus
Leo Leo Virgo Virgo
Local Attractions
Bend Visitors & Convention Bureau
Bend Visitors & Convention Bureau

Mt. Bachelor Resort
Mt. Bachelor Resort

Les Schwab Ampitheater
Les Schwab Ampitheater

Deschutes County Fairgrounds
Deschutes County

Tower Theatre
Tower Theatre

The High Desert Museum


Deschutes County

  Web    BendWeekly.com
© 2006 Bend Weekly News
A .Com Endeavors, Inc. Company.
All Rights Reserved. Terms under
which this service is provided to you.
Please read our Privacy Policy. Contact us.
Bend Weekly News & Event Guide Online
   Save the Net
External sites open in new window,
not endorsed by BendWeekly.com
Subscribe in NewsGator Online
Add to Google Add to MSN Add to My AOL
What are RSS headlines?