Weekly News via Email
   Set as homepage | Add to favorites | Customer Service | Subscribe Now | Place an Ad | Contact Us | Sitemap Saturday, 07.26.2014
Classifieds
News Archive
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
 1  2  3
 4  5  6  7  8  9  10
 11  12  13  14  15  16  17
 18  19  20  21  22  23  24
 25  26  27  28
Online Extras
Site Services
Around Bend
Outdoor Fun
Travel Info
Shop Local




Members Of



Poll: Today's Live Poll
Email to a friend | Print this | PDF version | Comments (0 posted) 
  Blogger |   del.icio.us |   digg |   newsvine

Feb 23,2007
What we've lost
by Bend Weekly News Sources

This country's response to the president on Iran, nuclear-bound and said to be meddling in Iraq, should be crafted around two words: shouldn't and can't.

The United States shouldn't jump into any other military adventure on Iran's account for a host of reasons. Key among them is because diplomacy spills no blood and hasn't been given ample opportunity.

But also because this country simply can't. It is stretched too thin in Iraq to do anything substantive militarily.

But there is one thing about this Iran debate that positively puzzles. That is the incredulity in the administration that anyone would doubt its claims about Iran and about what it intends to do about them.

It is as if the administration believes the public has been asleep since 2003 and during the walk-up to the war in Iraq. The nation doubts because it has discovered, to its dismay and misfortune, that it has no other choice.

Defense Secretary Robert Gates said recently, "I don't know how many times the president, secretary (of state Condoleezza) Rice and I have had to repeat that we have no intention of attacking Iran."

Hmm. And still the doubts.

Everything the administration says about Iran might be true, but anyone blaming the doubters has been inattentive since the first administration official uttered those fateful words: weapons of mass destruction, Sept. 11 and al-Qaida links to Saddam Hussein, mobile labs and mushroom clouds.

There can now be little doubt that this administration was more intent on going to war in Iraq than on legitimately proving a war of choice was necessary. Manipulation is a harsh word, but it appears to fit.

There is much to lament about what we've lost in the Iraq war. But, sadly, credibility and trust might be among the most grievous casualties.

Reprinted from The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel.

1220 times read

Related news
Iran, Syria don't belong at the table by The Detroit News posted on Mar 02,2007

Stop the war talk by The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel posted on Dec 07,2007

Cheney's War II by the St. Louis Post-Dispatch posted on Oct 26,2007

Sarkozy talks tough on Iran by UPI posted on Aug 28,2007

Iraq wants former agents to spy on Iran by UPI posted on Mar 10,2008

Did you enjoy this article? Rating: 5.00Rating: 5.00Rating: 5.00Rating: 5.00Rating: 5.00 (total 18 votes)

Market Information
Breaking News
Most Popular
Most Commented
Featured Columnist
Horoscope Guide
Aquarius Aquarius Libra Libra
Aries Aries Pisces Pisces
Cancer Cancer Sagittarius Sagittarius
Capricorn Capricorn Scorpio Scorpio
Gemini Gemini Taurus Taurus
Leo Leo Virgo Virgo
Local Attractions
Bend Visitors & Convention Bureau
Bend Visitors & Convention Bureau

Mt. Bachelor Resort
Mt. Bachelor Resort

Les Schwab Ampitheater
Les Schwab Ampitheater

Deschutes County Fairgrounds
Deschutes County
Fairgrounds

Tower Theatre
Tower Theatre

The High Desert Museum

Advertisements



Deschutes County

Google  
  Web    BendWeekly.com
© 2006 Bend Weekly News
A .Com Endeavors, Inc. Company.
All Rights Reserved. Terms under
which this service is provided to you.
Please read our Privacy Policy. Contact us.
Bend Weekly News & Event Guide Online
   Save the Net
Advertisement
External sites open in new window,
not endorsed by BendWeekly.com
Subscribe in NewsGator Online
Add to Google Add to MSN Add to My AOL
What are RSS headlines?