Weekly News via Email
   Set as homepage | Add to favorites | Customer Service | Subscribe Now | Place an Ad | Contact Us | Sitemap Wednesday, 05.23.2018
News Archive
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
 1  2  3
 4  5  6  7  8  9  10
 11  12  13  14  15  16  17
 18  19  20  21  22  23  24
 25  26  27  28  29  30  31
Online Extras
Site Services
Around Bend
Outdoor Fun
Travel Info
Shop Local

Members Of

Poll: Today's Live Poll
Email to a friend | Print this | PDF version | Comments (0 posted) 
  Blogger |   del.icio.us |   digg |   newsvine

Mar 30,2007
From 15 to millions
by The San Diego Union-Tribune

Blindfolded Westerners paraded by Iranian Revolutionary Guards are hardly new. In 1979, the guards paraded for the cameras 52 blindfolded Americans seized at the U.S. Embassy in Tehran and held hostage for 444 days.

Now it's 15 British sailors, seized late last week in what the Iranian government claims were Iranian waters. Britain says they were in Iraqi waters, searching commercial ships for contraband, as British ships have done for some time now.

Take your pick of potential reasons why President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, who some former American hostages believe was a participant in their seizure, chose this moment to thumb his nose at the West: To change the subject from United Nations sanctions against Iran, strengthened within hours of this incident? To negotiate an exchange for a former official and Revolutionary Guard who defected to the West earlier this month? To bolster support for Ahmadinejad's oppressive regime, which has antagonized many Iranians? To bolster support for Western opponents of the Iraq war? Whatever Iran's reasons, Britain has no reason to provoke such an incident and, having suffered two years ago a similar hostage-taking, has every reason to dissuade Tehran that extortion won't pay.

As London demands the immediate release of the sailors, Tehran may be easing toward just that, especially if an unspoken but credible "or else" underlies the diplomatic solution. From that comes a larger worry, instructive for a United Nations that too often dithers or retreats: What would the "or else" be if Iran comes to wield a nuclear weapon?

1108 times read

Related news
Refuting Iran's lies by Robert_J_Caldwell posted on Apr 13,2007

Iran stops showing detained U.K. sailors by UPI posted on Apr 02,2007

Harsh sanctions are needed to avert Iran war by The Detroit News posted on Mar 30,2007

Nuke talks only with IAEA, Iran says by UPI posted on Mar 05,2008

American Embassy in Tehran for sale by UPI posted on Apr 13,2007

Did you enjoy this article? Rating: 5.00Rating: 5.00Rating: 5.00Rating: 5.00Rating: 5.00 (total 10 votes)

Market Information
Breaking News
Most Popular
Most Commented
Featured Columnist
Horoscope Guide
Aquarius Aquarius Libra Libra
Aries Aries Pisces Pisces
Cancer Cancer Sagittarius Sagittarius
Capricorn Capricorn Scorpio Scorpio
Gemini Gemini Taurus Taurus
Leo Leo Virgo Virgo
Local Attractions
Bend Visitors & Convention Bureau
Bend Visitors & Convention Bureau

Mt. Bachelor Resort
Mt. Bachelor Resort

Les Schwab Ampitheater
Les Schwab Ampitheater

Deschutes County Fairgrounds
Deschutes County

Tower Theatre
Tower Theatre

The High Desert Museum


Deschutes County

  Web    BendWeekly.com
© 2006 Bend Weekly News
A .Com Endeavors, Inc. Company.
All Rights Reserved. Terms under
which this service is provided to you.
Please read our Privacy Policy. Contact us.
Bend Weekly News & Event Guide Online
   Save the Net
External sites open in new window,
not endorsed by BendWeekly.com
Subscribe in NewsGator Online
Add to Google Add to MSN Add to My AOL
What are RSS headlines?