Weekly News via Email
   Set as homepage | Add to favorites | Customer Service | Subscribe Now | Place an Ad | Contact Us | Sitemap Saturday, 01.20.2018
News Archive
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
 1  2
 3  4  5  6  7  8  9
 10  11  12  13  14  15  16
 17  18  19  20  21  22  23
 24  25  26  27  28  29  30
Online Extras
Site Services
Around Bend
Outdoor Fun
Travel Info
Shop Local

Members Of

Poll: Today's Live Poll
Email to a friend | Print this | PDF version | Comments (0 posted) 
  Blogger |   del.icio.us |   digg |   newsvine

Jun 08,2007
Deal is morally suspect
by The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel

There is developing in some quarters a sort of hold-your-nose acceptance of the so-called "grand bargain" immigration deal worked out between some U.S. senators and the White House. The rationale, even if not verbalized quite as plainly, is this: Because this deal offers a path to legal residency for the 12 million or so illegal immigrants already here, everyone should just swallow hard and urge passage of this legislation. It is faulty reasoning. This is no "grand bargain." It is a Faustian one. Some good may undoubtedly be achieved, but, as a whole, the deal is morally suspect.

It creates a path that the migrants already here have earned - for humanity's sake and by virtue of sweat and their sizable contribution to the economy - but also creates a new underclass, those "temporary" guest workers.

These workers will be asked to work for two years and to leave for one before being allowed to return, allowing up to six years of guest worker status. And after that, they don't get to stay. In other words, as we've said before, we're telling them that they are not good enough to be one of us, only to serve us. This is morally unacceptable. It is also impractical. It just won't work. Those guest workers won't be leaving. This arrangement makes it very likely that both workers and employers will ignore the law. Presto, a few years from now, we'll be talking about the new underclass living in the new shadows that this legislation will create.

Also under the heading of morally unacceptable: Replacing the system of admission because of family ties for one based on points for education and speaking English. This, too, will simply be incentive for families to reunite no matter what the law says. They are coming now without documents because of the backlog. Surely, such practical considerations as whether the provisions will work should be a significant factor as the Senate debates the legislation this week.

Congress can do better.

Reprinted from The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel.

996 times read

Related news
Bad for business by The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel posted on May 25,2007

Troubling questions by The San Diego Union-Tribune posted on May 25,2007

U.S. Needs Comprehensive Immigration Reform by Deborah Notkin posted on Feb 09,2006

Time ripe for reform by The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel posted on Apr 06,2007

Leaky borders and limited lives by the St. Louis Post-Dispatch posted on Jun 15,2007

Did you enjoy this article? Rating: 5.00Rating: 5.00Rating: 5.00Rating: 5.00Rating: 5.00 (total 25 votes)

Market Information
Breaking News
Most Popular
Most Commented
Featured Columnist
Horoscope Guide
Aquarius Aquarius Libra Libra
Aries Aries Pisces Pisces
Cancer Cancer Sagittarius Sagittarius
Capricorn Capricorn Scorpio Scorpio
Gemini Gemini Taurus Taurus
Leo Leo Virgo Virgo
Local Attractions
Bend Visitors & Convention Bureau
Bend Visitors & Convention Bureau

Mt. Bachelor Resort
Mt. Bachelor Resort

Les Schwab Ampitheater
Les Schwab Ampitheater

Deschutes County Fairgrounds
Deschutes County

Tower Theatre
Tower Theatre

The High Desert Museum


Deschutes County

  Web    BendWeekly.com
© 2006 Bend Weekly News
A .Com Endeavors, Inc. Company.
All Rights Reserved. Terms under
which this service is provided to you.
Please read our Privacy Policy. Contact us.
Bend Weekly News & Event Guide Online
   Save the Net
External sites open in new window,
not endorsed by BendWeekly.com
Subscribe in NewsGator Online
Add to Google Add to MSN Add to My AOL
What are RSS headlines?