Weekly News via Email
   Set as homepage | Add to favorites | Customer Service | Subscribe Now | Place an Ad | Contact Us | Sitemap Wednesday, 02.21.2018
News Archive
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
 1  2
 3  4  5  6  7  8  9
 10  11  12  13  14  15  16
 17  18  19  20  21  22  23
 24  25  26  27  28  29  30
Online Extras
Site Services
Around Bend
Outdoor Fun
Travel Info
Shop Local

Members Of

Poll: Today's Live Poll
Email to a friend | Print this | PDF version | Comments (0 posted) 
  Blogger |   del.icio.us |   digg |   newsvine

Jun 15,2007
Stalling free trade
by The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel

The compromise struck by the White House and congressional Democrats on trade last month is the kind of bipartisan effort that most Americans would like to see.

Led by Rep. Charles Rangel, D-N.Y., the Democrats would get environmental and worker protections in several pending trade pacts. And the Bush administration would get the ability to move swiftly ahead with the deals. To his credit, Rangel fought tighter and unnecessary controls sought by his party's protectionist labor wing.

While it's possible the compromise Rangel brokered could become a template for other agreements and perhaps even a worldwide accord, hopes are dimming. Deals with Panama and Peru are still held up, as are harder-to-reach pacts with Colombia and South Korea. In a sign of the Democrats' concerns, presidential candidate Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-N.Y., last week indicated she would oppose the South Korea deal.

The new protections worked out by Rangel for foreign workers and the environment are sensible and not overly burdensome. They would guarantee workers the right to organize, ban child labor and prohibit forced labor in trading-partner countries. Trading partners also would have to enforce environmental laws already on their books and comply with international environmental agreements.

Congress should insist on such protections. But it shouldn't try to put up a stop sign. Free trade benefits American workers by opening new markets to American products. The goal should be a global agreement as well as bilateral deals. But with presidential politics already playing a role, it's looking less likely that the sensible middle is going to win on this issue.

Reprinted from The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel - CNS

875 times read

Related news
McCain chides Democrats on NAFTA by UPI posted on Feb 29,2008

Reopening NAFTA could be dangerous by The Detroit News posted on Mar 07,2008

Pelosi: Bush 'stiffed American people' by UPI posted on Apr 14,2008

Clinton: Enforce U.S. trade laws by UPI posted on Apr 14,2008

It's still the economy, stupid by Phyllis_Schlafly posted on Jan 18,2008

Did you enjoy this article? Rating: 4.56Rating: 4.56Rating: 4.56Rating: 4.56Rating: 4.56 (total 18 votes)

Market Information
Breaking News
Most Popular
Most Commented
Featured Columnist
Horoscope Guide
Aquarius Aquarius Libra Libra
Aries Aries Pisces Pisces
Cancer Cancer Sagittarius Sagittarius
Capricorn Capricorn Scorpio Scorpio
Gemini Gemini Taurus Taurus
Leo Leo Virgo Virgo
Local Attractions
Bend Visitors & Convention Bureau
Bend Visitors & Convention Bureau

Mt. Bachelor Resort
Mt. Bachelor Resort

Les Schwab Ampitheater
Les Schwab Ampitheater

Deschutes County Fairgrounds
Deschutes County

Tower Theatre
Tower Theatre

The High Desert Museum


Deschutes County

  Web    BendWeekly.com
© 2006 Bend Weekly News
A .Com Endeavors, Inc. Company.
All Rights Reserved. Terms under
which this service is provided to you.
Please read our Privacy Policy. Contact us.
Bend Weekly News & Event Guide Online
   Save the Net
External sites open in new window,
not endorsed by BendWeekly.com
Subscribe in NewsGator Online
Add to Google Add to MSN Add to My AOL
What are RSS headlines?