Weekly News via Email
   Set as homepage | Add to favorites | Customer Service | Subscribe Now | Place an Ad | Contact Us | Sitemap Wednesday, 08.20.2014
Classifieds
News Archive
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
 1  2  3  4
 5  6  7  8  9  10  11
 12  13  14  15  16  17  18
 19  20  21  22  23  24  25
 26  27  28  29  30  31
Online Extras
Site Services
Around Bend
Outdoor Fun
Travel Info
Shop Local




Members Of



Poll: Today's Live Poll
Email to a friend | Print this | PDF version | Comments (0 posted) 
  Blogger |   del.icio.us |   digg |   newsvine

Aug 10,2007
Breaks for billionaires?
by the St. Louis Post-Dispatch

Private equity and hedge fund executives limousined to Capitol Hill last week to explain why they should be taxed less than ordinary Americans. Senators, their campaign funds fattened by Wall Street, made sympathetic noises.

Executives who make millions - sometimes hundreds of millions - of dollars a year argue that they should be taxed at lower rates than the department heads and factory workers and secretaries and chauffeurs who work for them.

It follows, then, that they believe working families also must carry a proportionately heavier burden for financing the services government provides: roads, schools, air controllers, health care for children and old people, patrolling our borders, safeguarding our foods and drugs, gathering intelligence against terrorists, conducting diplomacy, fighting wars, paying the interest on our national debt.

So far, the investment giants of the private equity and hedge fund world have got their way, paying about 15 percent in taxes on their earnings. The people who own them likewise pay a tax rate of about 15 percent on their personal earnings, which often are counted as capital gains. In contrast, a typical working couple pays 25 percent in taxes on income exceding $61,000 per year.

Proposals in Congress would raise the rate on some of those partnerships to the 35 percent rate most corporations pay. Individuals also would be taxed at income tax rates of up to 35 percent on their hedge-fund earnings.

Kenneth Griffin made more than $1 billion last year as head of the Citadel Investment Group, a Chicago hedge fund. "I am proud to be an American," he recently told The New York Times. "But if the tax became too high, as a matter of principle I would not be working this hard."

If Griffin were to be taxed at the top federal income tax bracket instead of the low capital gains rate, his take-home pay last year would have been a bit more than $650 million (before state taxes). If Congress raised the top income tax rate back to 70 percent, where it sat in the 1970s, he'd still pocket more than $300 million. As a matter of principle, would Griffin decline to exert himself for $300 million?

Hedge fund and private equity executives have warned senators that woe would befall the nation if their tax rates reflected those of other Americans - even including, we must point out, some very wealthy Americans.

"There will be deals that don't get done," said Bruce Rosenbloom of the Carlyle Group private equity firm in congressional testimony. "There will be entrepreneurs that won't get funded and turnarounds that won't get undertaken."

If so - and there's probably some truth to it - that would not be such a bad thing. Private equity firms operate largely by acquiring companies they hope to sell off later at a higher price. The process can be hugely profitable for the private equity owners, but it often proves terribly wrenching for the employees of the companies themselves.

Last week, The Wall Street Journal told the tale of Travelport Ltd., a travel booking firm in Colorado. The Blackstone Group, one of the world's largest private equity companies, and a venture capital firm bought Traveleport last August and quickly laid off 10 percent of the staff. The new owners then loaded up Travelport with debt to finance the deal and paid themselves a $1 billion dividend - with a "b" - an amount equal to their entire investment in the firm.

That leaves Travelport burdened with massive debt payments - and laid-off former employees losing their homes.

Such high-level financial manipulation does not make America stronger. At the very least, its practitioners should not be entitled to special tax breaks. Congress ought to move to correct this unjustifiable unfairness.

Reprinted from the St. Louis Post-Dispatch - CNS
799 times read

Related news
Taking Stock: Investments for the ethically challenged by Malcolm_Berko posted on Jul 06,2007

Flea market economics by the St. Louis Post-Dispatch posted on Jan 11,2008

The easy way out by The San Diego Union-Tribune posted on Dec 14,2007

Taking Stock: Nothing equitable about private equity firms by Malcolm_Berko posted on Aug 03,2007

The Savage Truth: Understanding the kiddie tax by Terry_Savage posted on Mar 05,2009

Did you enjoy this article? Rating: 5.00Rating: 5.00Rating: 5.00Rating: 5.00Rating: 5.00 (total 17 votes)

Market Information
Breaking News
Most Popular
Most Commented
Featured Columnist
Horoscope Guide
Aquarius Aquarius Libra Libra
Aries Aries Pisces Pisces
Cancer Cancer Sagittarius Sagittarius
Capricorn Capricorn Scorpio Scorpio
Gemini Gemini Taurus Taurus
Leo Leo Virgo Virgo
Local Attractions
Bend Visitors & Convention Bureau
Bend Visitors & Convention Bureau

Mt. Bachelor Resort
Mt. Bachelor Resort

Les Schwab Ampitheater
Les Schwab Ampitheater

Deschutes County Fairgrounds
Deschutes County
Fairgrounds

Tower Theatre
Tower Theatre

The High Desert Museum

Advertisements



Deschutes County

Google  
  Web    BendWeekly.com
© 2006 Bend Weekly News
A .Com Endeavors, Inc. Company.
All Rights Reserved. Terms under
which this service is provided to you.
Please read our Privacy Policy. Contact us.
Bend Weekly News & Event Guide Online
   Save the Net
Advertisement
External sites open in new window,
not endorsed by BendWeekly.com
Subscribe in NewsGator Online
Add to Google Add to MSN Add to My AOL
What are RSS headlines?