Weekly News via Email
   Set as homepage | Add to favorites | Customer Service | Subscribe Now | Place an Ad | Contact Us | Sitemap Wednesday, 11.26.2014
Classifieds
News Archive
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
 1  2  3  4  5
 6  7  8  9  10  11  12
 13  14  15  16  17  18  19
 20  21  22  23  24  25  26
 27  28  29  30  31
Online Extras
Site Services
Around Bend
Outdoor Fun
Travel Info
Shop Local




Members Of



Poll: Today's Live Poll
Email to a friend | Print this | PDF version | Comments (0 posted) 
  Blogger |   del.icio.us |   digg |   newsvine

May 11,2007
'King' of star explosions seen
by Bend Weekly News Sources

As­tro­no­mers have de­tected the bright­est stel­lar ex­plo­sion, or su­per­no­va, on rec­ord. They say it may be a new type of su­per­no­va that may also oc­cur be­fore long in our own ga­l­axy—what one re­search­er said would be his­to­ry’s most awe­some star show.

The find­ing comes from ob­ser­va­tions by NASA’s Chan­dra X ray Ob­serv­a­to­ry and ground-based tele­scopes. It in­di­cates vi­o­lent ex­plo­sions of ex­treme­ly mas­sive stars were fair­ly com­mon in the ear­ly uni­verse, sci­en­tists said.

“This was a tru­ly mon­strous ex­plo­sion, a hun­dred times more en­er­get­ic than a typ­i­cal su­per­no­va,” said Na­than Smith of the Uni­ver­si­ty of Cal­i­for­nia at Berke­ley, who led a team of as­tro­no­mers in the re­search. 

“That means the star that ex­plod­ed might have been as mas­sive as a star can get, about 150 times [the weight] of our sun. We’ve nev­er seen that be­fore.” 

As­tro­no­mers think many of the first gen­er­a­tion of stars were this mas­sive, and this new su­per­no­va may thus pro­vide a rare glimpse of how the first stars died.

The top pan­el is an artist's il­lus­tra­tion that shows what SN 2006gy may have looked like if viewed from near­by. The bot­tom left pan­el is an in­fra­red im­age from the Lick Ob­serv­a­to­ry, of NGC 1260, the gal­axy con­tain­ing SN 2006gy. The pan­el to the right shows Chan­dra's X-ray im­age of the same field of view, again show­ing the core of the gal­axy and SN 2006gy. (Image cre­dits: Il­lus­t­ra­tion: NA­SA/CXC/M. Weiss; X-ray: NA­SA/CXC/UC Ber­ke­ley/N. Smith et al.; IR: Lick/UC Ber­ke­ley/J. Bloom & C. Han­sen)

The su­per­no­va, known as SN 2006gy, pro­vides ev­i­dence that the death of such mas­sive stars is fun­da­men­tal­ly dif­fer­ent from the­o­ret­i­cal pre­dic­tions, re­search­ers claimed.

“Of all ex­plod­ing stars ev­er ob­served, this was the king,” said Al­ex Fil­ip­penko, lead­er of the ground-based ob­ser­va­tions at the Lick Ob­serv­a­to­ry at Mt. Ham­il­ton, Calif., and the Keck Ob­serv­a­to­ry in Mauna Kea, Ha­waii. 

“We were as­ton­ished to see how bright it got, and how long it last­ed.” The Chan­dra ob­ser­va­tion al­lowed the team to rule out the most like­ly al­ter­na­tive ex­pla­na­tion for the su­per­no­va, the as­tro­no­mers said: that a white dwarf star on­ly slight­ly heav­i­er than the sun ex­plod­ed in­to a dense, hydrogen-rich en­vi­ron­ment. In that event, SN 2006gy should have been 1,000 times brighter in X-ray light than what Chan­dra de­tected, they said.

“This pro­vides strong ev­i­dence that SN 2006gy was, in fact, the death of an ex­treme­ly mas­sive star,” said Dave Poo­ley of the Uni­ver­si­ty of Cal­i­for­nia at Berke­ley, who led the Chan­dra ob­ser­va­tions.

The star that pro­duced SN 2006gy ap­par­ent­ly blew off a large amount of mass be­fore ex­plod­ing, as­tro­no­mers said. This large mass loss is si­m­i­lar to that seen from Eta Cari­nae, a mas­sive star in our gal­axy, rais­ing sus­pi­cion that Eta Cari­nae may be poised to ex­plode as a su­per­no­va. Al­though SN 2006gy is in­trin­si­cal­ly the bright­est su­per­no­va ev­er, it is in the gal­axy NGC 1260, some 240 mil­lion light years away. Howev­er, Eta Cari­nae is on­ly about 7,500 light years away in our own Milky Way gal­axy. A light year is the dis­tance light travels in a year.

“We don’t know for sure if Eta Cari­nae will ex­plode soon, but we had bet­ter keep a close eye on it just in case,” said Ma­rio Livio of the Space Tel­e­scope Sci­ence In­sti­tute in Bal­ti­more, who was not in­volved in the re­search. “Eta Cari­nae’s ex­plo­sion could be the best star-show in the his­to­ry of mod­ern civ­i­liza­tion.” 

Su­per­novas usu­al­ly oc­cur when mas­sive stars ex­haust their fu­el and col­lapse un­der their own grav­i­ty. In the case of SN 2006gy, as­tro­no­mers think some­thing else may have trig­gered the blast. Un­der some con­di­tions, a mas­sive star’s co­re could pro­duce so much ra­di­a­tion in the form of gam­ma rays that some of the en­er­gy from the ra­di­a­tion con­verts in­to mat­ter. This takes the form of par­t­i­cles paired up with en­ti­ties that are in a sense their evil twins, called anti-par­t­i­cles. This leads to a drop in en­er­gy that causes the star to col­lapse un­der its own mighty grav­i­ty.

Next, runa­way ther­mo­nu­cle­ar re­ac­tions en­sue and the star ex­plodes, spew­ing the re­mains in­to space. The SN 2006gy da­ta sug­gest that it may have been more com­mon than pre­vi­ously be­lieved for the first stars to die in spec­tac­u­lar su­per­no­vas, ast­ro­nom­ers said. An alternative fate theo­rized for these ob­jects is to col­lapse into black holes, ob­jects so com­pact that their gra­vi­ta­tion­al force runs out of cont­rol and they start to suck in everything near­by, in­clud­ing light.

“In terms of the ef­fect on the ear­ly uni­verse, there’s a huge dif­fer­ence be­tween these two pos­si­bil­i­ties,” said Smith. “One pol­lutes the gal­axy with large quan­ti­ties of new­ly made el­e­ments and the oth­er locks them up for­ev­er in a black hole.” The find­ings  are to ap­pear in a forth­com­ing issue of the re­search pub­li­ca­tion As­t­ro­phys­i­cal Jour­nal.

 

 

 

Courtesy NASA Marshall Space Flight Center and World Science staff

1627 times read

Related news
First stars may have been supergiants, researchers say by World-Science.net posted on Jan 05,2007

Galaxy seen blasting its neighbor by Bend_Weekly_News_Sources posted on Jan 04,2008

Death from across the galaxy by Bend_Weekly_News_Sources posted on Mar 02,2007

'Superstrings' could raise cosmic clatter by World-science.net posted on Jan 12,2007

Milky Way’s black hole seen as particle smasher by Bend_Weekly_News_Sources posted on Mar 09,2007

Did you enjoy this article? Rating: 5.00Rating: 5.00Rating: 5.00Rating: 5.00Rating: 5.00 (total 14 votes)

Market Information
Breaking News
Most Popular
Most Commented
Featured Columnist
Horoscope Guide
Aquarius Aquarius Libra Libra
Aries Aries Pisces Pisces
Cancer Cancer Sagittarius Sagittarius
Capricorn Capricorn Scorpio Scorpio
Gemini Gemini Taurus Taurus
Leo Leo Virgo Virgo
Local Attractions
Bend Visitors & Convention Bureau
Bend Visitors & Convention Bureau

Mt. Bachelor Resort
Mt. Bachelor Resort

Les Schwab Ampitheater
Les Schwab Ampitheater

Deschutes County Fairgrounds
Deschutes County
Fairgrounds

Tower Theatre
Tower Theatre

The High Desert Museum

Advertisements



Deschutes County

Google  
  Web    BendWeekly.com
© 2006 Bend Weekly News
A .Com Endeavors, Inc. Company.
All Rights Reserved. Terms under
which this service is provided to you.
Please read our Privacy Policy. Contact us.
Bend Weekly News & Event Guide Online
   Save the Net
Advertisement
External sites open in new window,
not endorsed by BendWeekly.com
Subscribe in NewsGator Online
Add to Google Add to MSN Add to My AOL
What are RSS headlines?