Weekly News via Email
   Set as homepage | Add to favorites | Customer Service | Subscribe Now | Place an Ad | Contact Us | Sitemap Saturday, 08.23.2014
Classifieds
News Archive
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
 1  2  3  4
 5  6  7  8  9  10  11
 12  13  14  15  16  17  18
 19  20  21  22  23  24  25
 26  27  28  29  30  31
Online Extras
Site Services
Around Bend
Outdoor Fun
Travel Info
Shop Local




Members Of



Poll: Today's Live Poll
Email to a friend | Print this | PDF version | Comments (0 posted) 
  Blogger |   del.icio.us |   digg |   newsvine

Aug 03,2007
'Dark matter' doubters not silenced yet
by Bend Weekly News Sources

Astro­no­mers have be­lieved for dec­ades that most of the mat­ter in the cos­mos is un­seen. It be­trays it­self only through its gravita­t­ional pull on vis­i­ble ob­jects, whose move­ments are of­ten hard to ex­plain with­out this “dark mat­ter.”

And the past year has seen in­creas­ingly bold claims that as­tro­no­mers have “proved” the stuff’s ex­ist­ence.

De­spite that, there’s a core of doubt­ers who are­n’t go­ing away. Many of them are stick­ing by an al­ter­na­tive the­o­ry that holds that tweak­ing our un­der­stand­ing of gra­vity could ex­plain things bet­ter than in­vok­ing some un­seen sub­stance un­like any we know.

This Hub­ble Space Tel­e­scope com­pos­ite im­age shows a ghost­ly "ring" of pre­sumed dark mat­ter in the gal­axy clus­ter Cl 0024 17. It was called one of the strongest pieces of ev­i­dence to date for the ex­ist­ence of dark mat­ter, an un­known sub­stance that per­vades the uni­verse. (Cred­its: NASA, ESA, M.J. Jee and H. Ford [JHU])

One such modified-gra­vity the­o­ry has been “re­markably re­silien­t,” wrote as­tron­o­mer Stacy Mc­Gaugh of the Un­ivers­ity of Mar­y­land in Col­lege Park, Md. in the Aug. 3 is­sue of the re­search jour­nal Sci­ence. That the­o­ry, known as Mod­i­fied New­to­nian Dy­nam­ics or MOND, was pro­posed in 1983 by the Is­rae­li phys­i­cist Morde­hai Mil­grom.

As­tro­no­mers have sus­pected dark mat­ter’s ex­ist­ence since the 1930s, when the Dutch as­tron­o­mer Jan Oort found that ga­lax­ies did­n’t con­tain nearly enough vis­i­ble mass for their own gravita­t­ional force to hold them to­geth­er. Oort sug­gested there must be more, un­seen mat­ter.

Re­search­ers still haven’t been able to find it. But sev­er­al cos­mo­lo­g­i­cal the­o­ries sug­gest par­t­i­cles that could form it. And ev­i­dence for it has been mount­ing, ac­cord­ing to many as­tro­no­mers.

A year ago, re­search­ers claimed that “proof” of dark mat­ter could be found in a stup­en­dous crash be­tween two gal­axy clus­ters. The event had wrenched apart “dark” and “nor­mal” mat­ter—which nor­mally hang around close to­geth­er—letting as­tro­no­mers de­tect each sep­a­rate­ly. The dark mat­ter was again de­tecta­ble through its gra­vity, they said, which subtly al­ters the paths of light rays from ga­lax­ies in the back­ground.

Oth­er si­m­i­lar find­ings ap­peared more re­cent­ly, in the June 1 is­sue of The As­t­ro­phys­i­cal Jour­nal. This time re­search­ers us­ing NASA’s Hub­ble Space Tel­e­scope said they found a huge, ghostly “ring” of dark mat­ter in a gal­axy clus­ter called Cl 0024 17, five bil­lion light-years from Earth, again thanks to a col­li­sion. NASA billed the find­ing as some of “the strongest ev­i­dence yet” for dark mat­ter.

Yet prob­lems keep crop­ping up, Mc­Gaugh wrote. A study in the May 10 is­sue of Sci­ence found that the bi­zarre gravita­t­ional ef­fects at­trib­ut­ed to dark mat­ter were show­ing up even where they weren’t ex­pected to un­der dark mat­ter the­o­ry it­self. Mod­i­fied gra­vity the­o­ry—ac­cord­ing to which gra­vity is stronger on in­ter­ga­lac­tic scales than the stand­ard laws of gra­vity sug­gest—ex­plained the puz­zle neat­ly, he wrote.

The Sci­ence stu­dy, by Frédéric Bour­naud, of the AIM Lab­o­r­a­to­ry in Gif-sur-Yvette, France, and col­leagues, ex­am­ined a “d­warf gal­ax­y” that had formed from a larg­er gal­ax­y’s ejected de­bris in a crash. Com­put­er sim­ula­t­ions had found that only nor­mal mat­ter should be ejected in these col­li­sions; yet in con­flict with this, the dwarf gal­axy seemed to con­tain the same pro­por­tions of dark mat­ter seen else­where.

This sug­gests the “dark mat­ter” there­in is just some hid­den form of or­di­nary atoms, re­search­ers said—not the un­fa­mil­iar, ex­ot­ic sub­stance that as­tro­no­mers tra­di­tion­ally pos­tu­late most dark mat­ter is, based on sev­er­al the­o­ret­i­cal con­sid­era­t­ions. Con­ven­tion­al mod­els hold that of the 27 per­cent of the un­iverse that con­sists of mat­ter, more than 98 per­cent is un­seen; about five-sixths of that in turn is non­bary­onic, mean­ing not or­di­nary atoms.

Bour­naud pro­posed the stuff in the dwarf gal­axy is just hard-to-see hy­dro­gen. The find­ings may “pose an ex­is­ten­tial cri­sis for non­bary­onic,” or ex­ot­ic, dark mat­ter, Mc­Gaugh wrote.

On the oth­er hand, awk­wardly for MOND, cer­tain gal­axy clus­ters still seem not to have enough mass even af­ter that the­o­ry is ap­plied. So “MOND ap­pears to re­quire dark mat­ter it­self—a considera­ble em­bar­rass­ment for a the­o­ry that seeks to sup­plant the need for invis­i­ble mass,” Mc­Gaugh wrote.

MOND re­search con­tin­ues, though it’s less pop­u­lar than dark mat­ter stud­ies. Arx­iv.org, an on­line reposito­ry of phys­ics pa­pers, lists 12 pa­pers with MOND in the ti­tle for this year to date, four of which are ac­cept­ed for pub­lica­t­ion in sci­en­tif­ic jour­nals. By com­par­i­son there are 39 pa­pers with “dark mat­ter” in the ti­tle.

Fu­ture ex­pe­ri­ments could find dark mat­ter in the lab­o­r­a­to­ry, if it ex­ists: phys­i­cists be­lieve the Large Had­ron Col­lider, a par­t­i­cle ac­cel­er­a­tor to be built near Ge­ne­va, might do so. “Re­gard­less of how these ex­pe­ri­ments play out, there is clearly a great deal of fun­da­men­tal phys­ics left for us to learn,” Mc­Gaugh wrote.

Courtesy World Science staff

3171 times read

Related news
Monster black holes, quietly cruising the cosmos? by Bend_Weekly_News_Sources posted on Jun 01,2007

Could self-moving objects explain away 'dark matter'? by Bend_Weekly_News_Sources posted on Apr 06,2007

Paper takes swipe at bedrock law of physics by World-Science.net posted on Feb 16,2007

Other universes may be detectable, published study claims by Bend_Weekly_News_Sources posted on Jan 04,2008

First stars may have been supergiants, researchers say by World-Science.net posted on Jan 05,2007

Did you enjoy this article? Rating: 4.97Rating: 4.97Rating: 4.97Rating: 4.97Rating: 4.97 (total 73 votes)

Market Information
Breaking News
Most Popular
Most Commented
Featured Columnist
Horoscope Guide
Aquarius Aquarius Libra Libra
Aries Aries Pisces Pisces
Cancer Cancer Sagittarius Sagittarius
Capricorn Capricorn Scorpio Scorpio
Gemini Gemini Taurus Taurus
Leo Leo Virgo Virgo
Local Attractions
Bend Visitors & Convention Bureau
Bend Visitors & Convention Bureau

Mt. Bachelor Resort
Mt. Bachelor Resort

Les Schwab Ampitheater
Les Schwab Ampitheater

Deschutes County Fairgrounds
Deschutes County
Fairgrounds

Tower Theatre
Tower Theatre

The High Desert Museum

Advertisements



Deschutes County

Google  
  Web    BendWeekly.com
© 2006 Bend Weekly News
A .Com Endeavors, Inc. Company.
All Rights Reserved. Terms under
which this service is provided to you.
Please read our Privacy Policy. Contact us.
Bend Weekly News & Event Guide Online
   Save the Net
Advertisement
External sites open in new window,
not endorsed by BendWeekly.com
Subscribe in NewsGator Online
Add to Google Add to MSN Add to My AOL
What are RSS headlines?