Weekly News via Email
   Set as homepage | Add to favorites | Customer Service | Subscribe Now | Place an Ad | Contact Us | Sitemap Wednesday, 05.23.2018
News Archive
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
 1  2  3  4  5
 6  7  8  9  10  11  12
 13  14  15  16  17  18  19
 20  21  22  23  24  25  26
 27  28  29  30  31
Online Extras
Site Services
Around Bend
Outdoor Fun
Travel Info
Shop Local

Members Of

Poll: Today's Live Poll
Email to a friend | Print this | PDF version | Comments (0 posted) 
  Blogger |   del.icio.us |   digg |   newsvine

May 11,2007
Tijuana sewage treatment project still an open question
by Mike Lee

SAN DIEGO - The fate of the U.S. government's long-delayed attempt to improve treatment of Tijuana sewage remained shrouded in mystery Wednesday, despite a deadline that federal officials had set to complete several critical pieces of the costly proposal.

At least one major milestone - the execution of a construction contract - was missed. But the federal agency in charge of the project refused to answer questions about the contract, the financing or the regulatory approvals that were supposed to be in place by Wednesday.

The lack of answers generated additional concern about a project that has been debated and delayed for several years.

MEXSEWER - The odor reduction station is part of the U.S. International Boundary and Water Commission's treatment plant in San Ysidro. The plant was built in the late 1990s to treat Tijuana River sewage, but the water it discharges has never met federal water-quality standards. Photo by Scott Linnett.

"There appears to be no resolution in sight," Imperial Beach (Calif.) Mayor James Janney said.

The U.S. International Boundary and Water Commission and a private partner, Bajagua LLC of San Marcos, are trying to improve treatment of wastewater produced by the agency's San Ysidro facility. The plant was built in the late 1990s to treat Tijuana River sewage, but the water it discharges off the south San Diego County coast has never met federal water-quality standards.

Bajagua wants to pipe water from San Ysidro to its proposed treatment facilities in Tijuana and then sell the reclaimed water to local businesses. The company and the boundary commission said last year that their development agreement could be terminated if Bajagua failed to perform any of its obligations by May 2.

A Bajagua spokesman said the company had done everything it could to uphold the deal, but that "bureaucratic and international factors" have prevented it from issuing a construction contract and filling a bank account to pay for the work.

The boundary commission "has not communicated to us how they intend to proceed," said Craig Benedetto, spokesman for Bajagua. "We believe we have met our obligations and are awaiting a decision from them."

Critics have complained that Bajagua got the sole-source project because of its political connections. They also have questioned whether the company can make good on its promises.

Company boosters say there are plenty of safeguards and that Bajagua can do the job well.

If completed, Bajagua's project could cost U.S. taxpayers about $600 million over 20 years of operation. However, the U.S. government still could scrap plans for the Bajagua plant and try to build another treatment facility near the existing one in San Ysidro.

In February, President Bush's budget request included $66 million for a U.S. plant that would be available if the Bajagua project is canceled. At the time, a spokeswoman for boundary commission said domestic upgrades were "more efficient and less expensive" than construction in Tijuana.

On Wednesday, the Justice Department issued a one-sentence statement that left open the possibility that Bajagua's proposal wasn't the only one being evaluated. It said the government is "pursuing all available options to bring it into compliance with the Clean Water Act." Government lawyers refused to answer specific questions.

Even if the boundary commission sticks with Bajagua, it's not clear the government will pay for it. The president's budget request in February linked project funding for fiscal year 2008 to the parties' meeting the May 2 milestones.

Bajagua's plan also could be interrupted by U.S. District Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz. In June, he urged the boundary commission to get the project on track after regional water-pollution regulators complained about delays.

Moskowitz said he was prepared to order the agency to "formulate another plan" if "in the not-too-distant future, it becomes clear ... that the Bajagua project will not" meet water treatment standards by September 2008.

The San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board will review the issue May 9. Art Coe, a senior board staff member, said it doesn't appear that the boundary commission can meet the court-ordered deadline for water quality. He wouldn't speculate about how his agency's board would respond.

2431 times read

Related news
Report urges new look at two border sewage ideas by Terry Rodgers posted on May 18,2007

Did you enjoy this article? Rating: 4.75Rating: 4.75Rating: 4.75Rating: 4.75 (total 8 votes)

Market Information
Breaking News
Most Popular
Most Commented
Featured Columnist
Horoscope Guide
Aquarius Aquarius Libra Libra
Aries Aries Pisces Pisces
Cancer Cancer Sagittarius Sagittarius
Capricorn Capricorn Scorpio Scorpio
Gemini Gemini Taurus Taurus
Leo Leo Virgo Virgo
Local Attractions
Bend Visitors & Convention Bureau
Bend Visitors & Convention Bureau

Mt. Bachelor Resort
Mt. Bachelor Resort

Les Schwab Ampitheater
Les Schwab Ampitheater

Deschutes County Fairgrounds
Deschutes County

Tower Theatre
Tower Theatre

The High Desert Museum


Deschutes County

  Web    BendWeekly.com
© 2006 Bend Weekly News
A .Com Endeavors, Inc. Company.
All Rights Reserved. Terms under
which this service is provided to you.
Please read our Privacy Policy. Contact us.
Bend Weekly News & Event Guide Online
   Save the Net
External sites open in new window,
not endorsed by BendWeekly.com
Subscribe in NewsGator Online
Add to Google Add to MSN Add to My AOL
What are RSS headlines?